Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Each one individually, the variations in the integrating capacitor and amplifier gain resistors, requires that each be trimmed individually to the sound card for best performance.
By
KD5NWA <KD5NWA@...>
·
#431
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
I am glad you thought of that. I was thinking the same thing, a transceiver. But we would need the software for it as well.
Another thing I was thinking of would be to put a polyphase network in the
By
Bill Dumke
·
#430
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
That would be super, Tony!! I WILL be buying that option WHEN you make
it available. It would be neat to have the first SDR Xcvr in an Altoids tin.
Stan Rife
W5EWA
Houston, TX
K2 S/N 4216
By
Stan Rife <srife@...>
·
#429
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Yes, I will take at least one! I better not be too greedy.
73/72 - Mike WA8BXN
By
Mike WA8BXN
·
#432
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi Chris,
As I go through test on the SoftRocks I am building for people, I find image null from unit to unit is fairly uniform. It does take a little adjustment each time to get the best image
By
Tony Parks <raparks@...>
·
#428
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi, Tony
Yes, I will join in for all features ;-))
Again, will it be ready for AM, too?
All the best***
ze
Citando Tony Parks <raparks@...>:
MessageNo money now for sure! I am thinking
By
zehelmer@...
·
#426
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
You better believe there will be interest. But be ready with about 1600 Kits.
By
KD5NWA <KD5NWA@...>
·
#427
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
kb9yig wrote:
By
Milt
·
#424
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hello,
Yes, I would like to join in ;-)
Could it be used for good AM, too?
Many thanks***
Silva
Citando kb9yig <raparks@...>:
<html><body>
<tt>
Hello Everyone,<BR>
<BR>
I am
By
zehelmer@...
·
#423
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi Tony,
Yes I would like one as well.
One thought came up today at work... is the image nulling setting dependent
on the softrock used or can I use any softrock once I get it nulled? I
didn't know
By
Chris Waldrup <kd4pbj@...>
·
#422
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi Tony,
I am interested in the newer version.
I am not sure whether you have knowledge of the shipping process of the 1st one.
The shipping started Sept 29 and I am on the list. Are they shipped in
By
Rein, w6sz
·
#421
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi Tony
Count me in for the Two Board Unit.
Might need an Mute Circuit and Antenna Relay!
Here we go again, another 1000 kits!
Bruce K3CMZ
By
Bruce K3CMZ
·
#420
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Tony and all.......
YES, please do...especially the third board! W1TAG has already designed a LF exciter using a slower analog switch, and it works well at 137 and 190 Khz.
I have severe
By
KY1K <ky1k@...>
·
#419
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Ill take 2 when your ready!!
Steve
KG4JNL
By
steve <swells244@...>
·
#418
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
MessageNo money now for sure! I am thinking I could have a limited number of kits ready by the first week of November.
Incidently, I am considering the possibility of including an option for a third
By
Tony Parks <raparks@...>
·
#417
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
sign me up for at least one. it would be nice to make the layout easily
accomodate something other than the usb power approach as well.
73
jim ab3cv
By
Jim Miller <jim@...>
·
#425
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Oh WoW, can we send money now??? <G>
Stan Rife
W5EWA
Houston, TX
K2 S/N 4216
By
Stan Rife <srife@...>
·
#416
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
YES !!!
Stan Rife
W5EWA
Houston, TX
K2 S/N 4216
By
Stan Rife <srife@...>
·
#415
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Yes, that would be one of the considerations to make it easier to drive the QSD from an external quadrature clock.
Thousands, I was thinking more like doing a prototype run of twenty-five.
Tony
By
Tony Parks <raparks@...>
·
#414
·
|
Re: It's Alive! Hot receiver
Now what we need is a matching CW Transmitter with switching capability.
Stan Rife
W5EWA
Houston, TX
K2 S/N 4216
By
Stan Rife <srife@...>
·
#412
·
|