Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
'Like to express my interest.
73
Rob M0LET
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
By
Rob Collis
·
#452
·
|
Re: V5.0 SoftRock design (volunteer for alpha testing)
Hi, Tony.
Sounds real good. Put me on the list as an alpha test volunteer.
Would be willing to evaluate each board as it becomes available.
(i.e. main Rx board, plus each band/filter board, plus TX
By
Bruce Beford <bruce.beford@...>
·
#451
·
|
Re: V5.0 SoftRock design
Sounds great Tony. I don't think I would make a good beta tester. I am
not that proficient at electronics. I do well at putting the kits together,
but some/most of the "what makes it tick" part
By
Stan Rife <srife@...>
·
#450
·
|
Re: Power SDR going deaf?
Chris,
Wow! What a difference! I haven't made any detailed comparisons yet, but... WOW!
Tnx es vy 73 de KI4DEF
By
Kevin H. Miller <khmiller@...>
·
#449
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Good Morning Edson,
Yes, we did get a chance to test the SoftRock with the PCM2900 chip and did a alpha run of kits that included the PCM chip. The receiver works fairly well with this chip and
By
Tony Parks <raparks@...>
·
#448
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi Tony,
The modular approach for the new kit sounds really nice.
Did you have a chance to test the PCM2900 with the SoftRock? Perhaps
another little board with a PCM2900 could be added to the kit.
By
ewpereira
·
#447
·
|
V5.0 SoftRock design
Good Morning All,
There has been good response to doing a version 5.0 SoftRock so I
started the board layout this morning.
The board size of 1 inch by 1.5 inches for the top and bottom boards
looks
By
kb9yig <raparks@...>
·
#446
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Excellent idea. I would definitely get one, possibly two units.
Juan, NA0B.
By
Juan J. Manfredi <na0b@...>
·
#445
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Yes, great idea. Please count me in.
Dick atten
By
patt896 <d.patten@...>
·
#444
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi Tony,
I like also one!
Thanks, Fred Krom
PE0FKO
By
Fred Krom <fred.krom@...>
·
#442
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi Tony,
count me in on one of these.
Regards,
John g0orx/n6lyt
By
John Melton <john.melton@...>
·
#441
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
That is great! And I still haven't gotten my full SoftRock 40 kit yet. Count me in on Version 5 as well.
Bill WB5TCO
Bill Tracey wrote:
By
Bill Dumke
·
#440
·
|
Power SDR going deaf?
I initially started using the soft rock with the Power SDR software
but last night downloaded the SDRadio and am hearing a lot more
signals with it. I was able to easily null the image in the Power
By
fargonaz
·
#439
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi,
YES please.
Count me in, I'll order one of these kits.
Jarmo Blomster
oh8kva
By
jarmoblo <jarmo.blomster@...>
·
#438
·
|
VS: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Hi,
YES please.
Count me in, I'll order one of these kits.
Jarmo Blomster
oh8kva
By
Jarmo Blomster <jarmo.blomster@...>
·
#443
·
|
Softrock on 60 Meters
I found a 83 cent crystal at Mouser that will put the SR40 on 60
meters. (Digi-Key also has this frequency xtal). It's a 21.4772 mHz
xtal, resulting in an oscillator frequency of 5.3693 mHz. The
By
Bob Hillard <b.hillard@...>
·
#437
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
...
Yesyesyesyes! One, possibly two. I'm still kicking myself for
missing out on the last SoftRock kit!
By
Jeff <jeffd-yahoo@...>
·
#435
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Tony Parks wrote:
Softrock40 Version 5? YOU BET.
Bob
N4HY
--
Laziness is the number one inspiration for ingenuity. Guilty as charged!
By
Robert McGwier <rwmcgwier@...>
·
#436
·
|
Re: Version 5 SoftRock, anyone?
Tony's been on me for a few weeks to get cracking on software support for QSE style transmit. It should not be all too difficult. The DttSP guys (AB2KT and N4HY) have already done the heavy lifting
By
Bill Tracey <kd5tfd@...>
·
#434
·
|
Re: XG-1 and XG-2
Well, that's kind of what I decided esp. since I
already had an XG1. hi. I agree that the frequency is
not that important. I actually use my PIC-EL with DDS
card more for things like testing the SR-40
By
EricJ <eric_ke6us@...>
·
#433
·
|