Re: It's not that simple....
|
I once wrote a number of articles which were published on the internet. The publisher gave me a ceiling of 150k but I frequently found 15k to suffice. My target is double the definition (ie 0.5pixel size) at 100%. Most
people include photographs at full size, possibly cropped to include the unseen part. Small size is less important now but why use unseen material.
Archie
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: small-layout-design@... on behalf of Kennedy How howler37@... [small-layout-design]
Sent: 19 June 2018 05:04:39
To: small-layout
Subject: [small-layout-design] Re: It's not that simple....
?
?
John Garaty wrote:
> In summary, there are approximately 154Mb of filles and just over 1Gb of photos used across all the related Small Layout Design groups. This is over the top for a "standard". Yahoo Group's storage limits in the Files area. But It looks like this particular
group has "enhanced" storage limits somehow that someone probably has paid for?.
One of the other lists I'm on, PCL I think, was worried about file
sizes. I think the issue was the images/photos as well, many were of
original size. I believe that list owner found out that he could resize
all the images down from, say, a 3-4MB, down to something a lot less,
like maybe a couple hundred KB. Or less.
So the size of images may not be that big of an issue.
Another alternative that I've seen suggested is to move the posts and
the like to IO, and maybe one of the files. Leave the photos here if we
really want huge image files. Otherwise, shrink them and move them to IO.
Kennedy
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
