Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Repeater-Builder
- Messages
Search
Re: cavity filter docs
Robert D. Mantell
Kosa Tibor wrote:
Your first step would be to read all available information on duplexor technology. The RSGB book is a good source of info. You should also contact a manufacturer like WACOM Products and request all of their literature. They may be reached by e-mail: wacom@... You should scan back through the Repeater-builder list-serv posting for further info. If you have access to inexpensive materials, building your own is an option. Another option is to use two sites spaced far enough from each other that no cavities are required. They may be linked by wire or qrp radio. Please keep us informed of your progress Good luck and vy 73. Bob - W3TGG |
Re: Repeater Antennas
Ken Califf
What is the bandwidth/freq. of this antenna? Also what is price? I live in
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
central Ga. and was considering a new DB224. David Peterson wrote: From: David Peterson <DPeterson@...> |
Re: Sinclair Duplexers
I had a set of ResLock duplexers for 220 Mhz and they worked well. The only
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
problem that I had was one of the notch capacitors was touchy. This was a used set, also. Joe, K1IKE At 08:28 PM 4/26/99 , you wrote:
|
Sinclair Duplexers
Jeff Weinberg W8CQ
Hello All,
Thanks for the replies to my last request for info on the Motorola cavities. I have found another set that I need to find info on. I have searched the internet but have not come up with much. These are a set of Sinclair ResLock duplexers model Q3220E. They are described as 4 cavities built into one physical "rectangle". Present owner used them on a 440.600 repeater and are supposed to be good to 300 watts. Does anyone have any info on these units? Anyone with experience with these? The price seems right but I need more info before I can think of buying. Thanks again, Jeff Weinberg W8CQ w8cq@... |
Re: Motorola Cavities
James Hall
They do both and are excellent cavities. I use them in all my
440mcs. repeaters. Jim K7OET ---------- From: Jeff Weinberg W8CQ <w8cq@...> To: Repeater Builder <repeater-builder@...> Subject: [Repeater-builder] Motorola Cavities Date: Monday, April 26, 1999 4:18 PM Hello All, I have been searching for cavities for my 440 repeater. I have a lead on a set of Motorola cavities model/series T1500. They are described as 4 cavities with notch filters Does anyone have any info on these units? Are they band-pass/band-reject cavities or just notch, or both. The price seems right but I need more info before I can think of buying. Thanks in advance, Jeff Weinberg W8CQ w8cq@... |
Motorola Cavities
Jeff Weinberg W8CQ
Hello All,
I have been searching for cavities for my 440 repeater. I have a lead on a set of Motorola cavities model/series T1500. They are described as 4 cavities with notch filters Does anyone have any info on these units? Are they band-pass/band-reject cavities or just notch, or both. The price seems right but I need more info before I can think of buying. Thanks in advance, Jeff Weinberg W8CQ w8cq@... |
Service Monitor
Gregg Bergman
I found a Wavetek 3000B Service Monitor in working order for $1300.00. I am
considering purchasing this unit. Is this a fair price? Really wish I could find and afford one with a Spec An. Any one have the Manual or specs for this unit? Any recommendations? Thanks. Gregg Bergman gbergman@... gbergman@... |
DB Products
I think the response you get from DB is very erratic when the subject is amateur antennas. It depends entirely on who you talk to. I was transferred to a woman named Nicole who claimed to be an engineer. She insisted the technical information I wanted was on their website. I explained that it wasn't & repeated my question. She said she would email the info. She sent me the same file that was on the website. Forget Nicole. Other times, they have been helpful.
Mike KE4SHA |
Re: Repeater Antennas
Thomas, Kevin
Hello Terry,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
KB5ZVK here to tell you that I'm using a DB420 set at 451.000 mhz. 35 watt transmitter on a 175' tower at a ground level of 185' with 1 5/8 hardline and I get a range 40 miles to a mobile on medium power and still abile to use the autopatch on a cat1000 controler. I called DB Products about the antenna. and they told me that I could get a new phasing harnes tuned to amateur band But the price scared me away so I'm still using the this antenna tuned for 451.000 mhz. I love it.And have no complaints about the operation. -----Original Message----- |
Re: Repeater Antennas
David Peterson
Try Sinclair Labs. They will tune their antennas in
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
the Ham Bands. To me they are just as good as DB, but last time I've checked they are less expensive then DB. I have a new SRL-224 new in the box. It is for two meters, if any one is interested. Dave KD4POG PS this would have to be a pick up or a meet somewhere near the Atlanta area. this is a large antenna. -----Original Message-----
From: drreality [mailto:drreality@...] Sent: Saturday, April 24, 1999 4:37 PM To: Repeater-builder@... Subject: [Repeater-builder] Repeater Antennas From: drreality <drreality@...> Hi Guys: I am working on putting a repeater together with a few other folks help, and I am in need of a reccomendation of a good UHF repeater antenna. I have seen a few of the DB products antennas and called them about an antenna that would work for amateur UHF purposes. They informed me that they do not build an antenna for the Amateur UHF frequencies. I would like to stay away from the fiberglass antennas also. The local repeater here used one for a while but the noise buildup sometimes made the repeater almost useless to use. The frequency for this new repeater is on 442.700 Mhz. Any help you folks could reccomend would be appreciated. Terry KF0AO ------------------------------------------------------------------------ G-SHOCK SPORTS WATCH - Built Tough! Built Cool! G-SHOCK keeps you in Sync! Shock Resistant and Loaded with Features! Electo-luminescent, Satisfaction Guaranteed*No-Hassle Returns*Only $69 Free Freight in US ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by the owners and users of "RBTIP" |
Re: 13-509 mods?
tom oliver
Is 220 NOTES still around? If not how about someone scanning in all the back
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
issues and posting it somewhere? tom n8ies joecheck@... wrote: From: joecheck@... |
Re: Mitrek, Pin Outs
tom oliver
check the above link I think it will answer all your questions tom n8ies Kevin Mitchell wrote: From: Kevin Mitchell <sparc@...> |
Re: Legal requirements
Richard D. Reese
Chuck,
I believe you are correct. I have operated one or more remote base transmitters for over 20 years. Some individuals want to overly complicate things. Reminds me of the time someone complained that I made an autopatch on one of my repeaters and did not identify the third party traffic. I could not convince the Extra class license holder that there were only two parties involved. There was my wife on the phone and I was on the radio going through the repeater for which I was the trustee. Could not convince him that there were only two parties when I made a phone call and three only when using a system with the call of another on it. Rich Chuck Kelsey wrote: From: Chuck Kelsey <kelsey@...>-- Richard & Charmaine Reese WA8DBW 330-335-0122 |
cavity filter docs
Kosa Tibor <[email protected]
Hi Guys,
We are, in my little HAM-community in Gyor, Hungary, Thinking to start repeaters. We have surplus radios, aerials, but the big Enemy is the duplexer (cavity filter). We need homebrewer's technical docs how to build a good cavity filter for 10, 6, 2 m and 70 cm bands. Can anybody help with some technical literature on any other ideas? Thanks in advance Tibor HA 1 US email: kosat@... or ha1us@... |
Re: 13-509 mods?
At 09:11 PM 4/25/99 , you wrote:
I have some copies of "220 Notes" articles from years ago. I'll look for them. I had a 13-509 repeater for years, and did some of the mods. As a matter of fact, that repeater is still alive & well and is for sale by the present owner. Give me an email and remind me in a few days in case I forget, it's early. Joe, K1IKE |
Mitrek, Pin Outs
Kevin Mitchell <[email protected]
Hi All,
I have a low band Mitrek radio, which is being used for our 10mtr repeater. I have got so far with it, but have come across a couple of problems which I need some help. On the 19 pin socket 1 pin has discriminator audio on it, and 2 pins have speaker audio. Can someone please supply me with the pins. Also I know that you can not ground either side of the speaker, doing so will kill the audio amp, not a problem. Can I use a standard 8ohm speaker? Thanks in advance. Regards Kevin, ZL1UDD. |
Re: Motorola MSR2000 Power Supply
litz
Andrew,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Here's a general run-down of all the voltages and what they go to: High Current Output: 13.1 to 16.3 VDC, with 36 amp load, and 2 amp load respectively Voltage is regulated *normally* only by the ferroresonat action in the secondary winding. Of course there are the large caps and L601 (the large 420uH choke) for filtering/voltage support - but no adjustments. This feeds power only to the PA. Distribution Board (TPN6138): Provides over current (fuses) and overvoltage protection (18V) through a load resistor, as discussed previously. Aux Reg board (TRN5119A): Supplies 9.4 and 13.9 VDC, regulated, and are both adjustable. The 9.4VDC is rated for 1.1 amps, with a current limit of 2.3 amp (foldback protected). The 13.9VDC section is rated for 1.16 amps, with a current limit of 2.3 amps (also foldback protected). Ratings are at 25`C. The 9.4 and 13.9 VDC voltages supply power to the receiver(s), exciter, and control modules. (not the PA) TP101 should read 9.4 v, and TP111 should read 13.9 v, under standby and TX conditions. If you have aprox 15.0VDC to the PA with a 20 amp load, your power supply is in good shape! BTW are you converting a base to a repeater? E-mail privately if you are... -Brian N0PMZ At 04:44 PM 4/25/99 PDT, you wrote:
From: "Andrew Jones" <ve3gtu@...> |
Re: Remore Base Legal requirements
Richard Bomboy
This is true but the point was about relevance
At 12:27 AM 4/26/99 -0400, you wrote: From: JHowel@... Dick WA3USH "It happens, just deal with it" The people will not understand the importance of the Second Amendment until it is too late." -- Thomas Jefferson *** WARNING TO UNSOLICITED SPAMMERS*** Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II,"Any and all nonsolicited E-mail (SPAM) sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee of $500.00 US" !!! E-mailing to this address denotes acceptance of these terms. |
Re: Remore Base Legal requirements
Richard Bomboy
Now what has that to do with ID?? If you listen to a broadcast station
aqll ya hear is the main xmitter not the studio link either, which has as much relevance to this discussion as yer receiver statement. Point is, it is a xmitter and has to be IDed, period. At 11:10 PM 4/25/99 -0400, you wrote: From: Chuck Kelsey <kelsey@...> Dick WA3USH "It happens, just deal with it" The people will not understand the importance of the Second Amendment until it is too late." -- Thomas Jefferson *** WARNING TO UNSOLICITED SPAMMERS*** Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II,"Any and all nonsolicited E-mail (SPAM) sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee of $500.00 US" !!! E-mailing to this address denotes acceptance of these terms. |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss