开云体育

Oh, so like a VOIP or something? Yeah, putting modem tones over a VOIP line doesn't work. Doesn't the CAT-1000 have a regular RS-232 port as well? There should be a way to interface that instead.

Sorry, but that is not a correct interpretation. These are frequencies setup and known in advance. Therefore, the user knows. And really, the only requirement a ham has for frequency is to know that

Only the repeater trustee is responsible. The users would be responsible to know that they can't program an out-of-band frequency in their radios, just like they always would. Can't happen. These

Yep, that's why I backed out of it. Rules are guidelines and are frequently outdated by the time they are published. You also shouldn't have to take every sentence at face value. Rules are written to

Thanks Burt: Same too you! PJ (AA3PJ) Quoting Burt K6OQK <biwa@...>:

Just a note to wish you all a Happy New year and extra special wishes for good health and much contentment. Burt, K6OQK

It's sad how often discussions on a technical list degenerate into bickering about FCC rules. So many people concerned about following the rules - except when it comes to themselves respecting the

I think we’re actually just disagreeing on what constitutes “the most important point.” Indeed, most (if not all) currently used trunking modes with more than one frequency would not entirely

I don't believe the MTR2000 SCM (System Control Module) will allow for that - it would probably error out.? Once you set the band in the SCM, it expects to see both TX and RX frequencies within the

Toms assertion that the user is the control operator of a repeater is incorrect. A lot of folks simply have never read the rules and fcc opinions concerned repeater operation.

I think the simplest test would be to take your computer/300 modem to a place where there is a wired landline and see if it still fails. 73, Joe, K1ike

Isn't the same true of EVERY repeater? That said, the control op is not responsible for "ensuring" the ID of the user radios - only the repeater(s). If you are using a repeater, YOU are responsible

You guys are missing the most important point about trunking and modes like DMR roaming. Does the control operator know when the radio is transmitting or what frequency is used every time it

The time lag of the OOMA may be the cause of your problem; I have also seen this issue with the various VOIP services. If you don't actually have a real landline for comparison, you may never get to

It's been a while since I've used dial up networks.? The CAT1000 has a Motorola 300 baud modem for remote access to the controller.? When I dial into the controller with my circa 1995 Best Data

FB6 is a business radio class: FB6 - Private Carrier (profit) A repeater operated by a radio communications provider for multiple subscribers who are covered under the *carrier's license*. Not

Eric.fort.listmail@...> wrote: What if someone screwed up the programming of a conventional ham repeater w

The repeater licensee is responsible for the repeaters Rd emissions. The user is only responsible for his own transmitter.

Not quite the same legal result between one 4 channel trundled system with multiple talk groups and 4 separate repeaters. The key difference is in the case of 4 separate repeaters the licensee holding

I doubt you can do that with an MTR 2000 but you can with a Quantar - in fact a Quantar can have 2 receivers of 2 different bands at the same time. Thanks, Dan Woodie, CETsr KC8ZUM