Hello Andy,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Some interesting findings. What would be more interesting would be to find a direct replacement for the mics, specifically a part number. Although not sure how hard it would be to replace it on some of the radios. Of course still looking for some information about the? Explorer QRZ-1 radio. Looks like I will purchase one tomorrow to find out how it does. Mick - W7CAT ----- Original Message -----
From: "wj9jrg via groups.io" To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2025 07:08:04 AM Subject: Re: [repeater-builder] Explorer QRZ-1 Radio So I did some comparisons across several china radios, specifically aWLN, a UV6R and a UV5. Goal was to make transmit audio some louder.connection, I could achieve > 5khz deviation. But with the same condenser mic, I coulddifferent one off a voice recorder playback module that I had lying around, andafter replacing on this same radio, where I averaged about 2-3 kcdeviation, it was now 4-5+ KC.mics, and they set gain and deviation for best case being at 5KC. What elseAssociation (TARRA) via groups.io wrote:had oneHello Terry, whatthat I tried that had enough level, new hams aside, I am going from likeI have checked myself. thatthis radio may have promise. Wish I had one to try first. I suppose will beI could buy one and if it isn't any good, send it back. gear.some other reports when people get back from the Dayton Hamvention. which IThat being said, another local ham and I each have the TYT-UV88, monitor. Inbelieve that Explorer radio is just a rebadged version of. We've had results.fact I was using that UV88 earlier today. Several of us are also using hadradios are they are too far away from the mic, talking too softly, mic --the mic gain too low and was on narrowband. He corrected those issues Untitled Document |