That was actually the procedure I used and got it looking good on the 2600s tracking gen. I will try it with band new swept known good cables and do the procedure again and see if I get a different result. I will also throw it on the nanovna and see what it looks like there. I only have 4 or 5 duplexers under my belt. Certainly not the experience many of you all have. I'm still in the learning stage.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Remove all cables and tune each cavity individually - tune the pass for best match (return loss), then set the notch.? As long as the notch wasn¡¯t far off from where it needed to be, adjusting the notch will not ¡°pull¡± the pass.? Then harness everything back together and check the results ¨C it should meet or exceed spec.
?
The factory tuning instructions assume you only have a signal generator and some means of detection.? It is decidedly a dumbed-down approach that is going to lead to mediocre results at best.
?
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? --- Jeff WN3A
?
?
Well, per the suggestions here I did get it tuned up and it looked textbook on my r2600 but when I put it on the quantar the quantar went into pa fold back high vswr. I've never had that happen before when a duplexer looked good on a service monitor. Back to the drawing board. Try different known good cabes and retune it and see if maybe I had a bad cable throwing off readings.
?
Found the instructions here:
Instructions used an RF millivolt meter for some of the adjustments but I used an HP 8920A service monitor with 6dB pad at the end of the test cable.?