I am not a fan of the SurgeX units.? I have seen little evidence that they do what they claim and there are some serious design flaws for such an expensive unit.? An example would be the obvious one - a ground bonding point.? They don't have one and rely solely on the power safety ground connection which does not provide a good bond for bonding purposes. You would be much better off installing a Type 2A SPD with SADs and MOVs in replaceable modules at your electric panel plus a Type 3 SPD PDU at your equipment.? This combination takes care of the vast majority of spikes and surges effectively and they do not blow unless there is a very significant incident.? This is the combination specified for communications sites in Motorola R56 and thousands of mission-critical communications sites use this configuration effectively.? I would trust that any day over a snake-oil solution. Dan Woodie, CETsr KC8ZUM On Sat, Nov 19, 2022, 10:08 AM <rsnyder@...> wrote: I recently installed?series-mode surge protection devices (SurgeX SX-1115-RT) on two repeaters that have switched-mode power supplies.? The surge protectors do not use sacrificial components such as Metal Oxide Varistors (MOVs) that are commonly used in low-cost units.??They are designed to withstand up to 1000 occurrences of surge pulse voltages up to 6000 volts, or 500,000 occurrences of 1000 volts. |