|
Re: Weak Io-C 2024-12-09
开云体育hi carl,
nice noise clean spectra - we are fighting with the commercial radio signals. You dont have that at all!.
thanks john s.
Aloha john s.
Ing. john sommer-HD Informatik-?konomi
l?nnevang 12 4180 sor??
40786158
Sendt fra
-- Aloha - john s, |
|
Re: Weak Io-C 2024-12-09
John.... There are days and weeks where my spectra is nothing but noise.? Too a point I have to crank color offsets to the mif THOUNSANDS... Carl On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 11:42?PM john sommer via <josom0212=[email protected]> wrote:
|
|
Re: solar type III at 1618 UT.
I saw it, several very strong bursts at 35 MHz.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-Kevin On Dec 10, 2024, at 11:23 AM, Thomas Ashcraft via groups.io <ashcraft@...> wrote: |
|
Re: 09 Dec 2024 Suspected non-Io-C
Hi Sabine,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You definitely saw Jupiter. Either non-Io-A'' or non-Io-C. Strange that Nancay didn't see it. Strange that the Nancay spectrogram, ostensibly for the 9th, shows an RCP vertex late non-Io-A-style arc instead of the normal RCP vertex early Io-B arc at around 2100 UTC on the 8th. I do not remember Nancay's file naming scheme -- do they name the files 1) with the date of the start of the observation like everyone else, or 2) with the date of the /end/ of the observation in an effort to confuse everyone, or 3) with whatever date takes up the greater portion of the spectrogram, to REALLY confuse everyone, including themselves? I thought it was #2, but if that's so, their J241209 spectrogram you posted is rather strange. If it's #1, then they saw that vertex late arc at 2100 on the 9th, then that is indeed in a normal non-Io-A area of the phase plane. Just for fun, you might compare their J241210 spectrogram (after they make it available) with this spectrogram of yours from the 10th. -- Dave On 12/10/24 04:23, Sabine Cremer wrote:
After an Io-B event, an event occurred in zone "C" which I am cautiously calling |
|
09 Dec 2024 Suspected non-Io-C
After an Io-B event, an event occurred in zone "C" which I am cautiously calling non-Io-C. Caution is advisable because nothing can be seen in the Nancay spectrograms, but there is hope because both Faraday banding and weak modulation lanes are visible in parts of the spectrogram.
?
Sabine
--
Germany Standard time: UTC +1 hour |
|
Re: Weak Io-C 2024-12-09
Nice Carl.? Some "N events" (Narrow band) in there.? Thanks for saving with the camera button and attaching the photos.? That made it super easy to just click on one of your image files to compare with the same region on mine, though it was really far too low here and off the end of my dipole. Jim On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 8:17?AM Carl Pajak Phone via <pajakonice=[email protected]> wrote:
|
|
Re: 08 Dec 2024 non-Io-A / non-Io-A''
I think I saw some of this on my Indiana dipole. The darker image?used the Normalize function in RSS.? Even in the non-normalized version, you can see the Faraday lanes. Jim S On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 10:24?PM Dave Typinski via <davetyp=[email protected]> wrote:
|
john sommer
Carl Pajak Phone
Kevin O. Shoemaker
Dave Typinski
salvador aguirre
Sabine Cremer
