About SMT.......
IF you despise SMT crumbs (as I do)? and would
rather SEE what you are playing with then I suggest
the higher power devices.... like for
resistors... instead of using itsybitsy 0805 ... use size
?2512 SMD Resistors.... seen in green circle in
this link image:
and for transistors......
here are some sizing comparisons.....
I settled on DZT2222A-13? as my "go to" SMD
transistor after losing way too many MMBT2222A to the carpet
gods.
This was a water sensor project to dump air
conditioner condensation overflow water:
On 12/16/2019 11:12 AM, Michael
Maiorana wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Here's what I
have so far. Hopefully this will be legible as an inline
image. I'm a Kicad noob, so be gentle :)
I used Jim's
original design with the roll-your-own mixers. This is the
receiver only. There is no VFO, transmit mute or audio amp. My
issue with the discrete audio amp as designed by Jim is that
hard to find audio transformer. I'm not sure if I should add
audio amplification to this board or just do the audio
functions on a different board. Thoughts?
I plan to use
an Si5351 ebay board and an arduino uno as a VFO/LO to get it
running (commonly available code), then possibly design?a
simple, low power vfo/display.
My intention is
to use mostly surface mount parts (0805 size resistors and
caps, SOT-23 size transistors and diodes).
Opinions are
welcome!
Best regards,
Mike M. KU4QO
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 9:46
AM Mike Maiorana <
zfreak@...> wrote:
Thanks
Jerry.?
I spent
some time this morning looking at the different versions
of this rig, from the original to the Norcal version.
The first thing that struck me was how crowded and
complex the Norcal board looks when built. I'm sure they
spent a tremendous amount of time with the redesign and
layout of that board. Not for the faint of heart.?
They made
some substitutions, like replacing the discrete?mixers
with ADE-1 mixers. I am curious as to why Norcal kept
the audio amp the way they did instead of going to a
simpler integrated amp. Any ideas? They also did away
with the variable bandwidth IF filter.?
I
thought?it might be fun to lay out the receiver section
using mostly surface mount parts. Not necessarily to get
it smaller, but instead to make it less congested.?
I bought a couple of the
Si5351 boards from Ebay. I could use those as the VFO,
with plans to go to a more elegant (lower power)
solution later.
This sounds fun, but maybe
it's just because I had too much coffee this morning.
I'll start adding things to Kicad and see where I end
up.?
Best regards and 73
Mike Maiorana
KU4QO
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at
7:20 PM Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke=
[email protected]>
wrote:
The Raduino used on
the uBitx consists entirely of a 5v regulator, an
Arduino Nano clone, an Si5351, and a standard 16x2 LCD
with backlight.
Power consumption is 40ma without the display, the
display (mostly the backlight) sucks another 20ma.
? ??/g/BITX20/message/52886
The linear regulator is typically powered from the main
12v supply, so that Raduino heats the room with 60ma*12v
= 0.72 Watts.