Thank you for the details about the caps and
transformer.
On 12/12/2019 10:15 PM, Jerry Gaffke
via Groups.Io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
John,
I prefer to have these conversations within the forum
Often there's somebody else with the extra info needed to resolve
an issue.
As Ryan says, people come to this forum because they want to see a
technical discussion.??
I spent a career in digital design, much of this RF stuff I am
only now figuring out
by hanging out in these forums.? It's how we learn, both by
hearing what others have
to say, and by trying to put into coherent words that what we
think we know.
Private email can be sent by going to a forum post on the website
such as
? ??/g/qrptech/message/397
Then click "Reply", fill in your message, then click "Private" on
the bottom right, and "Send".
Me, I may not respond, I prefer to have these discussions within
the forum.
Anyways, here's a datasheet plus a brief description of the
transformer used at T3 and T5
? ??
? ??
The left side has 14 turns, nominally 4.5uH, Diz says it's
adjustable between 3.2 and 5.7 uH
Internally, there's a 47pF cap.
With just the 47pF cap (plus a few pf of stray capacitance due to
board traces and such)
in parallel with the mid-range setting of 4.5uH on the coil, it
resonates at 10.7mhz.
As you surmise, with a 470pf cap at C43 in parallel with the
internal 47pf cap,
it can be parallel resonant at our target frequency of around
3.5mhz.
A parallel resonant circuit is a short circuit to all but the
resonant frequency,
so only our 3.5mhz energy goes on through the transformer to show
up at the secondary.
Getting to your primary puzzle, I doubt the right side is trying
to be resonant.
The datasheet says the right side only has 2 turns, whereas the
left side has 14 turns,
So the inductance is far less, your inductance meter speaks the
truth.
I'm guessing the cap at C44 would work about as well if it were
0.1uF instead of 470pf.
Would be an interesting experiment to tack a cap in parallel, see
if performance changes.
It does sort of look like a series resonant circuit, so we might
think it would not conduct
unless at the resonant frequency.? However, the output of that
transformer is a voltage source
with our 3.5mhz sine wave, the 470pf cap at C44 does not see an
inductance to interact with.
If you didn't want this filter in place, could remove C43, T3, and
C44, drive the base
of Q6 through a series DC blocking cap from a clean source of
3.5mhz (sine or square wave).
At T5, we have our roughly 4.5uH inductor in parallel with the
internal 47pf plus the
external 470pf of C64.? As with T3, the parallel resonance does
not allow our desired
3.5mhz energy to pass through, so the 3.5mhz must find its way out
toward the base of Q7 instead.
What T5 does allow through is DC into Q6 from the power supply.
To make T5 broadband it could be replaced with an RF choke just
like L4, be sure to remove C64
Anyways, if I am correct, you pretty much had it figured out on
your own.
Yup, the ride from Lewiston to Enterprise gives you a couple
hundred sharp curves
on the Rattlesnake and Buford Grades where you cross the Grande
Ronde.
Good road to practice your cornering on a bike, assuming you don't
find a log truck.
We're off grid in a straw bale house about 3 miles west of the top
of that Buford Grade,
but would take us a 30 minute drive to get there.? It's rough
country.
Jerry, KE7ER
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 05:05 PM, John Roland wrote:
Jerry,
Thanks for all your response and interesting ideas.?? My
frustration beyond the fluctuation in the output over about 100
kcs, is that I don't really understand how the filter works.?? I
think see a parallel resonant circuit comprised of the left side
of T3 and C43 plus the internal capacitor which I assume shunts
out of band frequencies to ground but passes desired frequencies
(3.5 mHz).?? I'm having trouble with the right side of T3.?? My
inexpensive Chinese inductance meter gives me a very low value
of inductance between the 2 pins on the right side of T3 (pins 4
and 6 from the datasheet)? (.16 uH)? which would resonate with
C44 at around 18 mHz if I'm using my online calculator
correctly.?? At which point I decide that must not be how it
works..... ?
Sorry to drag the group through this, but I couldn't find your
email address.? I'm in QRZ and visible in the directory for this
group.
And yes you're just over the hill from me.? I grew up in
Lewiston and Enterprise was a frequent day trip on the
motorcycle 50 years ago.??
/John