开云体育

Chuck! What thickness of Al did you use? I take it you have a bending brake of some sort? 73! Mark KA6WKE Website: https://www.ka6wke.net Live Stream: https://www.ka6wke.net/live-stream Facebook:

The posting to the list about not having an enclosure on a rig and what can happen is the reason that I learned to make my own.? Too many projects to buy enclosures that cost almost the price of the

Hello Randy, AD7ZU, Thank you for your kind words. I'm sure you know that sinking feeling in your stomach when you release the Magic Smoke from a kit you have spent some time and energy putting

I hope I speak for all here in expressing our sincere condolenceson the untimely loss of your beloved QCX.? Fortunately it has become an organ donor that may breathelife into a future project.

Hello William, K6WHP, The Arduino was my entry drug into hobby electronics. A CK-1000 Basic Electronics Parts Kit from Radio Shack was the beginnings of my fascinating journey into the mysterious

Love your tag line. On another Forum, I'm using: "I'm not bossy. I just know what you should be doing." I had an interesting conversation with my doctor, who was complaining about my weight (which is

"Ken, KM4NFQ '*N*ot *F*ully *Q*ualified'" Ken, based upon your call (KM4...), I'd say you're MORE THAN FULLY QUALIFIED for two reasons: (1) In a world populated by "Baofeng Techs", you have leapt into

in > Hans, G0UPL, et al I do not doubt that there are some people out there who could have put the Magic Smoke back into that QCX, but I was not one of them. That QCX was sitting on a table, three or

Hi Ken, all still in the I hope you are planning to repair it! Magic smoke can always be put back in :-) The QCX could be built one section at a time, tested section by section too. But that isn't the

I really do like the price points of the 5-Watter and the QCX. I am looking forward to getting an 'Organic 5-Watter' when it comes out. I have purchased three (3) QCX 5W CW transceivers. I let the

Hi all... Remember the QCX 5W monoband CW transceiver kit already contains a synthesizer, rotary encoder and display - dual VFO, Split, RIT, memories, messages... see http://qrp-labs.com/qcx and is

Ed, I took the liberty of replying to you per your QRZ email address. -- William, K6WHP "Cheer up, things could get worse..so I cheered up and, sure enough, things got worse!"

There is a Sierra interest group on Yahoo. The manuals can be found there. https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sierra_wilderness_radio/conversations/messages Also, GQRP had (has) new band boards -

"The big thing is 5 W puts it in the range of most QRP radios for performance." It also allows my Hardrock-50 to be driven to full output on those days that QRP doesn't cut the mustard. John AE5X

chuck adams writes: Ditto on that. Vern wound toroids like he was stitching up after oral surgery. And, he was a big guy with big stubby fingers to boot. He inspired many of us to wind a good looking

I am not a great fan of winding toroids. But it gets good performance partly by using enough of them in the right places. The RF engineer in me has no problem with that. Patience is the key. I did do

I would like both calculations if possible. I will donate them to the Math Dept at our local high school for the kids who need them. Let me know how you’d like payment and I’ll do it today. Thanks

I saw how many there were on the board, that's what inspired my tongue-in-cheek question to Chuck, but I am still game for a 30M 5W to keep my 30M 1W company. Looking forward to the release.

I can't claim Cruelty-Free...too many toroids to wind.

the receiver is almost a carbon copy and why not it was a great receiver. The biggest difference is a 5W final compared to the 1W of prior effort. I'd expect it to work as well, just a bit more punch.