Also thanks for all the hard work and updates Ladislav.? I am really enjoying QLog.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 8:18?AM Michael Morgan via <cmorgan13= [email protected]> wrote: I made a signed/notarized?build for MacOS on my GitHub based?on 0.38.? Not sure if you want to copy it over Ladislav but it does work fine with the online maps, all icons etc.? I will make a clean Build Action and pull it up to make sure you have one that works hopefully in the master.
73
Michael, AA5SH
You folks are amazing...
?
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
I made a signed/notarized?build for MacOS on my GitHub based?on 0.38.? Not sure if you want to copy it over Ladislav but it does work fine with the online maps, all icons etc.? I will make a clean Build Action and pull it up to make sure you have one that works hopefully in the master.
73
Michael, AA5SH
You folks are amazing...
?
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
You folks are amazing...
?
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Let me inform you that a new QLog release v0.38.0 is finished.
Changelog:
- [NEW] - Logbook - Added Send DX Spot to the QSO Context Menu
- [NEW] - DX Filter - Added Dedup Time/Freq difference setting (@aa5sh)
- [NEW] - Rig Setting - Added RTS/DTR PTT Type support (issue #353)
- [NEW] - Bandmap - Scrollbar position is saved per band (issue #415)
- [NEW] - New Contact - Added a dynamic value completer for SIG field (issue #425)
- [NEW] - Awards - Added SOTA/POTA/WWFF (@aa5sh issue #311)
- [NEW] - Awards - Added Not-Worked Filter
- [NEW] - New Contact - Added Long Path Azimuth info
- [NEW] - POTA Fields allow a comma-delimited list of one or more POTA Refs
- [NEW] - WSJTX tunes freq/mode like Rig if rig is disconnected
- [CHANGED] - Alert Widget is a Dock Widget (issue #399)
- [CHANGED] - QLog adds more information from callbook for WSJTX QSOs (issues #403 #405 #420)
- [CHANGED] - File Open dialogs are not a native dialog under Linux (issue #427)
- [CHANGED] - Profiles transferred to DB
- [CHANGED] - LOV last_dates transferred to DB
- [CHANGED] - DX Cluster - Login Callsign is always the base Callsign
- [REMOVED] - Setting DXCC Date
- Fix for MacOS Layout Geometry Restore (@aa5sh)
- Fixed TQSL does not block GUI thread
- Fixed MacOS build process (@aa5sh)
Changelog:
|
I would think you should be able to create different?station profiles for each callsign.? Then select it when using those conditions.? You can create user filters to filter the log by callsign as well.
Michael, AA5SH
I have a few different callsigns (RSL's), is it possible to segregate logs dependant on callsign used similar the the profile feature of CQRLog or log into different SQL databases/tables?
--
73'd de Dave, G8FXM
|
I have a few different callsigns (RSL's), is it possible to segregate logs dependant on callsign used similar the the profile feature of CQRLog or log into different SQL databases/tables?
--
73'd de Dave, G8FXM
|
|
|
|
|
Poll - Using Callbook's QTH information for Digi modes - last 3 day
Hello, If you want to influence QLog, you have the last 3 days to accept or reject a feature request. The poll is open until 23/8, and the question is: Should QLog use Callbook's QTH information and save it when using external QSO sources (WSJTX, FLDigi, etc.) when matching the callsign and partially matching the gridsquare (e.g., JN70 from QSO and JN70AA from the callbook)? Github link .
Regards Ladislav
|
OK. The next release will display the LP azimuth.
Regard Ladislav
You are correct.
?
Still using the manually activated Hy-Gain controller for the Tail Twister
|
Hi Wolfgang,
oh, did you mean using regex? Not very user friendly, but ok. I got it sorted. Thanks for pointing me.
--
___
Slav, EI6KW, SP3RXO
|
You are correct.
?
Still using the manually activated Hy-Gain controller for the Tail Twister
|
It is possible. You can find all information on this in the wiki.
?
Wolfgang, DL2KI
|
Hi,
Is it possible to add multiple call signs to one alert? If not, it could be useful for award hunting, current dx expeditions hunting etc. etc.
--
___
Slav, EI6KW, SP3RXO
|
Hi,
only SP is displayed but Rotator Widget can rotate SP or LP. Based on the fact that you are asking, I conclude that you do not have a rotator connected via QLog. So the LP would be good to see, right?
Amazing logging program!!!!
?
Any way to display the long path in the info screen?
?
?
|
Amazing logging program!!!!
?
Any way to display the long path in the info screen?
?
?
|
Hi
?
In settings under the equipment section it is possible to enter antenna profiles. Thank you.
?
When entering contacts in the main window there is an option to select the antenna in use under the "My Station" tab.
?
My request is as follows:
?
Please provide an option (check box) to allow the antenna to follow the radio. Having a check box to "Opt In" will allow greater scope for operator efficiency.
?
To clarify:? When the radio is on 10m then the antenna in "My Station" automatically follows and reads the correct antenna from the "Antenna Profiles" section in setup. The same occurs when changing to any other band.
?
73
Adam VK4IM
?
?
|
Thanks Ladislav,
I'll take into account your advice of usign SIG and SIG_INFO
fields.
Regards.
----
El 2/8/24 a las 11:04, ok1mlg via
groups.io ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thank you for your explanation.
For this case, it is more
appropriate to use SIG and SIG_INFO. You don't think UserDefine fields
should be part of QLog.
Regards
Ladislav
p¨¢ 2. 8. 2024 v?9:50
odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan= [email protected]>
napsal:
Hi,
maybe USERDEFINED ADIF fields is a feature not much
people use. I only suggested 'cos I use it but it maybe
worthless and difficult to implement.
Next an edited example from a simple ADIF registry with
USERDEFINED field:
<adif_ver:5>3.0.9
<USERDEF1:3:S>DME
<USERDEF2:3:S>DCE
<USERDEF3:4:S>DEFE
<USERDEF4:4:S>DMVE
<USERDEF5:4:S>DMUE
<USERDEF6:4:S>DVGE
<USERDEF7:3:S>DEE
<USERDEF8:4:S>EAFF
<eoh>
<qso_date:8:d>20240610 <time_on:6>195930
<call:6>EA5XXX <band:2>6M <mode:3>FT8 <tx_pwr:3>100
<rst_sent:3>+01 <rst_rcvd:3>+04 <time_off:6>200029
<name:12>Name Example <qth:25>02320 Balazote (Albacete)
<comment:25>FT8? Sent: +01? Rcvd: +04
?
?<dxcc:3>281? <ituz:2>37? <cqz:2>14 ?
<pfx:3>EA5? <cont:2>EU? <freq:9>50.315441 ?
<gridsquare:4>IM88 ?
<notes:9>Notes ...
<qso_complete:1>? ?
? <lotw_qsl_sent:1>Y? <lotw_qsl_rcvd:1>N ?
<lotw_qslsdate:8>20240716? <lotw_qslrdate:8>20240716? ?
?<DME:5>02012 ?
<distance:5>00111 ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_status:1>Y ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_date:10>2024-06-10 ?
?
?<app_qrzlog_logid:10>1109247426
<my_name_intl:25>V¨ªctor Jos¨¦ 'Vic' S¨¢nchez <my_city_intl:8>Albacete <my_postal_code_intl:5>02003
<my_state:2>AB <my_cq_zone:2>14 <my_itu_zone:2>37
<my_gridsquare:6>IM98bx <my_lat:11>N038 58.750 <my_lon:11>W001 52.500 <my_rig_intl:12>Yaesu FT-847 <station_callsign:6>EA4GRG <operator:6>EA4GRG
<eor>
----
El 1/8/24 a las 16:26, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
Hi,
The SWL Check is not a problem. I
don't see from your description how you use it,
but I assume that the SWL check should be
present in the QSO Detail Dialog, right?
On the other hand, I have a problem with the
UserDefined field. Unfortunately, it is still not
clear from your description how you use it. Also, keep
in mind that UserDefined fields are not transferable
between applications. So, I would be very careful with
this one. I just want to know if something that is
already used in ADIF (e.g. SIG field) can be used
instead of UserDefined fields. That's why I would like
you to describe an example of its usage.
Regards
Ladislav
st 31. 7. 2024 v?11:11
odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan= [email protected]>
napsal:
Hi,
thanks for your answer and sorry if I
misunderstanding
El 31/7/24 a las 11:00, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
HI,
It's not a
problem to add something. But I have to
know what and why it should be added.
Unfortunately, it is not
entirely clear from your description
what and why you want to add.
SWL Check - Do
you mean ADIF field "SWL"?
Yes. Sometimes I receive listener-only reports
and it could be interesting.
USERDEF - Do
you mean ADIF's USERDEF that are defined
like ?
Can you please describe what you
use it for?
Yes. I usually use for some kind of awards to store
extra information for easy searching.
Both are only suggestions.
Regards.
st 31. 7. 2024
v?10:39 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via
<vjosesan= [email protected]>
napsal:
Hi
all,
this is my first post in QLog mailing list.
I've just trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple
of features to take into
account for future releases, if it was
possible:
- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info
- USERDEF fields support
Thanks in advance and congratulations for your
work.
|
Thank you for your explanation.
For this case, it is more appropriate to use SIG and SIG_INFO. You don't think UserDefine fields should be part of QLog.
Regards Ladislav
p¨¢ 2. 8. 2024 v?9:50 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan= [email protected]> napsal:
Hi,
maybe USERDEFINED ADIF fields is a feature not much people use. I
only suggested 'cos I use it but it maybe worthless and difficult
to implement.
Next an edited example from a simple ADIF registry with
USERDEFINED field:
<adif_ver:5>3.0.9
<USERDEF1:3:S>DME
<USERDEF2:3:S>DCE
<USERDEF3:4:S>DEFE
<USERDEF4:4:S>DMVE
<USERDEF5:4:S>DMUE
<USERDEF6:4:S>DVGE
<USERDEF7:3:S>DEE
<USERDEF8:4:S>EAFF
<eoh>
<qso_date:8:d>20240610 <time_on:6>195930
<call:6>EA5XXX <band:2>6M <mode:3>FT8 <tx_pwr:3>100
<rst_sent:3>+01 <rst_rcvd:3>+04 <time_off:6>200029
<name:12>Name Example <qth:25>02320 Balazote (Albacete)
<comment:25>FT8? Sent: +01? Rcvd: +04
?
?<dxcc:3>281? <ituz:2>37? <cqz:2>14 ?
<pfx:3>EA5? <cont:2>EU? <freq:9>50.315441 ?
<gridsquare:4>IM88 ?
<notes:9>Notes ...
<qso_complete:1>? ?
? <lotw_qsl_sent:1>Y? <lotw_qsl_rcvd:1>N ?
<lotw_qslsdate:8>20240716? <lotw_qslrdate:8>20240716? ?
?<DME:5>02012 ?
<distance:5>00111 ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_status:1>Y ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_date:10>2024-06-10 ?
?
?<app_qrzlog_logid:10>1109247426
<my_name_intl:25>V¨ªctor Jos¨¦ 'Vic' S¨¢nchez <my_city_intl:8>Albacete <my_postal_code_intl:5>02003
<my_state:2>AB <my_cq_zone:2>14 <my_itu_zone:2>37
<my_gridsquare:6>IM98bx <my_lat:11>N038 58.750 <my_lon:11>W001 52.500 <my_rig_intl:12>Yaesu FT-847 <station_callsign:6>EA4GRG <operator:6>EA4GRG
<eor>
----
El 1/8/24 a las 16:26, ok1mlg via
±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
Hi,
The SWL Check is not a problem. I don't see from your description
how you use it, but I assume that the SWL check should
be present in the QSO Detail Dialog, right?
On the other hand, I have a problem with the UserDefined
field. Unfortunately, it is still not clear from your
description how you use it. Also, keep in mind that
UserDefined fields are not transferable between applications.
So, I would be very careful with this one. I just want to know
if something that is already used in ADIF (e.g. SIG field) can
be used instead of UserDefined fields. That's why I would like
you to describe an example of its usage.
Regards
Ladislav
st 31. 7. 2024 v?11:11
odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan= [email protected]>
napsal:
Hi,
thanks for your answer and sorry if I misunderstanding
El 31/7/24 a las 11:00, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
HI,
It's not a problem to
add something. But I have to know what and why
it should be added. Unfortunately,
it is not entirely clear from your description
what and why you want to add.
SWL Check - Do you mean
ADIF field "SWL"?
Yes. Sometimes I receive listener-only reports and it
could be interesting.
USERDEF - Do you mean
ADIF's USERDEF that are defined like ?
Can you please describe what you use it
for?
Yes. I usually use for some kind of awards to store extra
information for easy searching.
Both are only suggestions.
Regards.
st 31. 7. 2024 v?10:39
odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan= [email protected]>
napsal:
Hi
all,
this is my first post in QLog mailing list. I've just
trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple of
features to take into
account for future releases, if it was possible:
- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info
- USERDEF fields support
Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.
|
Thank you for your explanation.
p¨¢ 2. 8. 2024 v?9:50 odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan= [email protected]> napsal:
Hi,
maybe USERDEFINED ADIF fields is a feature not much people use. I
only suggested 'cos I use it but it maybe worthless and difficult
to implement.
Next an edited example from a simple ADIF registry with
USERDEFINED field:
<adif_ver:5>3.0.9
<USERDEF1:3:S>DME
<USERDEF2:3:S>DCE
<USERDEF3:4:S>DEFE
<USERDEF4:4:S>DMVE
<USERDEF5:4:S>DMUE
<USERDEF6:4:S>DVGE
<USERDEF7:3:S>DEE
<USERDEF8:4:S>EAFF
<eoh>
<qso_date:8:d>20240610 <time_on:6>195930
<call:6>EA5XXX <band:2>6M <mode:3>FT8 <tx_pwr:3>100
<rst_sent:3>+01 <rst_rcvd:3>+04 <time_off:6>200029
<name:12>Name Example <qth:25>02320 Balazote (Albacete)
<comment:25>FT8? Sent: +01? Rcvd: +04
?
?<dxcc:3>281? <ituz:2>37? <cqz:2>14 ?
<pfx:3>EA5? <cont:2>EU? <freq:9>50.315441 ?
<gridsquare:4>IM88 ?
<notes:9>Notes ...
<qso_complete:1>? ?
? <lotw_qsl_sent:1>Y? <lotw_qsl_rcvd:1>N ?
<lotw_qslsdate:8>20240716? <lotw_qslrdate:8>20240716? ?
?<DME:5>02012 ?
<distance:5>00111 ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_status:1>Y ?
<qrzcom_qso_upload_date:10>2024-06-10 ?
?
?<app_qrzlog_logid:10>1109247426
<my_name_intl:25>V¨ªctor Jos¨¦ 'Vic' S¨¢nchez <my_city_intl:8>Albacete <my_postal_code_intl:5>02003
<my_state:2>AB <my_cq_zone:2>14 <my_itu_zone:2>37
<my_gridsquare:6>IM98bx <my_lat:11>N038 58.750 <my_lon:11>W001 52.500 <my_rig_intl:12>Yaesu FT-847 <station_callsign:6>EA4GRG <operator:6>EA4GRG
<eor>
----
El 1/8/24 a las 16:26, ok1mlg via
±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
Hi,
The SWL Check is not a problem. I don't see from your description
how you use it, but I assume that the SWL check should
be present in the QSO Detail Dialog, right?
On the other hand, I have a problem with the UserDefined
field. Unfortunately, it is still not clear from your
description how you use it. Also, keep in mind that
UserDefined fields are not transferable between applications.
So, I would be very careful with this one. I just want to know
if something that is already used in ADIF (e.g. SIG field) can
be used instead of UserDefined fields. That's why I would like
you to describe an example of its usage.
Regards
Ladislav
st 31. 7. 2024 v?11:11
odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan= [email protected]>
napsal:
Hi,
thanks for your answer and sorry if I misunderstanding
El 31/7/24 a las 11:00, ok1mlg via ±ð²õ³¦°ù¾±²ú¾±¨®:
HI,
It's not a problem to
add something. But I have to know what and why
it should be added. Unfortunately,
it is not entirely clear from your description
what and why you want to add.
SWL Check - Do you mean
ADIF field "SWL"?
Yes. Sometimes I receive listener-only reports and it
could be interesting.
USERDEF - Do you mean
ADIF's USERDEF that are defined like ?
Can you please describe what you use it
for?
Yes. I usually use for some kind of awards to store extra
information for easy searching.
Both are only suggestions.
Regards.
st 31. 7. 2024 v?10:39
odes¨ªlatel V¨ªctor J. S¨¢nchez via <vjosesan= [email protected]>
napsal:
Hi
all,
this is my first post in QLog mailing list. I've just
trying it and it
looks very well. I'd like to ask for a couple of
features to take into
account for future releases, if it was possible:
- SWL check (or whatever seemly) in a QSO info
- USERDEF fields support
Thanks in advance and congratulations for your work.
|
WW4DX
Dave, G8FXM
Slav, EI6KW