I'd like to clarify that I am not looking for help. My question is about the quality of the article.
I'm a retired oil industry research scientist/programmer. I've written a couple hundred thousand lines of numerical software and fixed bugs in a couple million lines of other people's code. I can draw Fourier transform pairs on a bar napkin. The figures do not look right and I can find no explanation in the text that might shed light on the matter.
From time to time I can be incredibly dense and completely miss what someone is saying. By the same token I've seen many instances of programs producing completely incorrect results which the user did not recognize was wrong. Posting to this list seemed the best way to find out if I was just being especially dumb when I read the paper.
Reg
