开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: Narrow Gauge & Industrial Railway Modelling REVIEW


 

开云体育

I agree that as a complete item, the paper copy is always going to win for me, and I'd never want to replace mine with an ephemeral digital copy. Having said that, I do wonder if making it easy to obtain (for a fee of course) digital copies of drawings that have appeared in the REVIEW would be useful. If I'm modeling something from a drawing I always end up with numerous printed copies I scrawl all over. If it's a drawing from the REVIEW this means scanning the relevant pages. While not a huge chore getting the scale right, and keeping lines straight across double page drawings etc. is a nightmare.

You could even limit this service to just the out of print issues, or issues over a year old etc. so as not to impact at all on the paper copies.

I have a feeling Roy has offered to make printed copies of drawings in the past, but an easy to use system for digital copies (and yes I know copyright and digital locks etc. are a problem, but the layout issues go away if we are just talking drawings and not the articles) linked to the search-able index would be great.

Mark


On 26/07/18 08:36, John C via Groups.Io wrote:

Roy and I have been deliberating over this for some years. There are some substantial costs involved to ensure correct copyright protection. Digital?editions really require a different layout to support small devices which means double the production effort. And having a digital edition is likely to reduce, rather than supplement,?the paper distribution to the point it becomes unviable. And we have had many people stating they prefer the paper as evidenced here.

@Brian - we do have a searchable digital index here:?

John

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.