Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: i need help , NANA VNA-H
Thank you I will try that :)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I basically gave up , I might be buying a rig expert zoom35 ? On Sep 5, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Roger Need via groups.io <sailtamarack@...> wrote: |
Re: My Win 11 machine does not recognize the Nanovna H4 in DFU mode.
#nanovna-h4
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:50 AM, ALTON MCCONNELL wrote:
1.0.71 is an old version of firmware. Hugen has just released a new H4 version based on DiSlord firmware. Many, many new features. There are two versions SI and MS. SI is for original Skyworks clock chip and MS is for Chinese clone. If your unit was produced recently it may have the MS version and you will see an M on the label on the back of your unit. Link here >> Not all SD cards work for reasons given in another post. I use a Kingston 32 GB SD card and it works fine. Roger |
Re: i need help , NANA VNA-H
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 02:20 PM, Nick M wrote:
Try this.. Go into Expert Settings and select Clear Config (password is 1234). Then do a Touch Cal to calibrate your touch screen. Then Save. This should restore default settings. Then try calibration (remember to reset before calibrating). Roger |
Re: i need help , NANA VNA-H
Well getting somewhere, transform mode ,is off now, i updated the firmware, look great , but still can't get to hold a calibration. I Calibrate on the software ., I get a center of smith chart, , i do a sweep , absolute mess . , I do cont sweep with dummy load, then if take off the dummy load , still shows , mess, no change ?
This unit was working last week , i guess it is junk ? |
Re: i need help , NANA VNA-H
Nick,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
In the first two photos of message 29622, it appears that the NanoVNA is in Transform mode. Did you intend that? (Transform is an item in the Display menu.) --John Gord On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 01:03 PM, Nick M wrote:
|
Re: i need help , NANA VNA-H
Video link thank you !!!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sep 5, 2022, at 1:03 PM, Nick Manzo <w7nik@...> wrote: |
Re: i need help , NANA VNA-H
Thanks Roger , I am understand how it should work , I wish I could get a single dot on the smiths chart . Scattered after reset and cal . It was hot yesterday, so all day I tried to get it to work again.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It a shame just over a year old :( Maybe I messed with expert settings? What are the proper settings. On Sep 5, 2022, at 10:21 AM, On Sep 5, 2022, at 10:21 AM, Roger Need via groups.io > <sailtamarack@...> wrote: |
Re: NanoVNA-H v3.6 vs NanoVNA-H4 v4.3 for SWR measurements
I've done that on the theory that the NVNA approximated the size and ground plane of a Baofeng HT. I was able to determine that the cheap tri-band whip sold by one of the recent names in the business is really only a dual band. the vendor has no clue what in the world I was talking about when I asked for test data. They couldn't put me in touch with anyone that wasn't reading talking points off a screen. I got a refund. Thanks, NanoVNA!
73 -Jim NU0c On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 11:08:57 -0700 "Dave via groups.io" <dvfuller@...> wrote: I use my H to evaluate handheld antennas with an adapter connected to the S11 connector and hold it like it was a handheld. I usually touch the ground at the connector and I get pretty decent readings and they're good enough for me to sort the good antennas from the bad ones. I am always amazed at this little device as to how well it works on all my amateur antennas. |
Re: NanoVNA-H v3.6 vs NanoVNA-H4 v4.3 for SWR measurements
I use my H to evaluate handheld antennas with an adapter connected to the S11 connector and hold it like it was a handheld. I usually touch the ground at the connector and I get pretty decent readings and they're good enough for me to sort the good antennas from the bad ones. I am always amazed at this little device as to how well it works on all my amateur antennas.
|
Re: My Win 11 machine does not recognize the Nanovna H4 in DFU mode.
#nanovna-h4
Thanks for the reply Roger!
Well, I am not a computer tech. Finally figured out that win 10 drivers would work and there is driver loading software in the 64 bit H4 zip file. I upgraded to DIslords v .1.0.71. Got the H4 talking to NanoVNA Saver and NANOVNA on my tablet. Calibration works using commercial standards. Matches my home made standards very closely. I do mostly HF with Some VHF and UHF. I have not checked my Home made standards at VHF or UHF yet. Unable to get the SD memory card to work. Memory chips are probably too new and too large at 32 GB. My H4 platform is STM32F303xC Analog and DSP. TCXO is 26 MHz. Many thanks to all that made this wonderful piece of test equipment possible! Alton, NU8L |
Re: i need help , NANA VNA-H
On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 11:06 PM, Nick M wrote:
Did you install DFUSe demo? It installs the driver. If you are getting a flag then you can manually update the driver by right clicking and then pointing to the DFUse directory where the driver is located. The location is: C:\Program Files (x86)\STMicroelectronics\Software\DfuSe v3.0.6\Bin\Driver This video describes the process >> The issue , is simple , i reset on the software VNAsaver . 40 version forBefore you start updating the firmware you should check that you can calibrate the NanoVNA in standalone mode without a PC connection. Remember to Reset first. The do the SOL calibration and check for proper operation with each cal load. on the Smith chart you should get a dot on the far left for a short, center for 50 ohms and far right for open. My screenshots shown below. Roger |
Re: i need help , NANA VNA-H
The -h dings when i go into dfu boot mode , the device manager has a flag on it to upgrade driver.
The issue , is simple , i reset on the software VNAsaver . 40 version for this example . i set up the freq range ,1.mhz to 4 mhz Reset I start the calibration assistant, all is well. . i hit save , i set up cont sweep , i get swr all over the place, 1.1, 5.5 etc with the 50 ohm connected, i take off the 50 ohm the same thing all over the place . . What is wrong ? |
Re: cable extensions etc.
I get all of my connectors and feedline from RF Connection (www.rfconnection.com). Joes, W3RFC, has top quality products and he supports the ham community. You can see him at every hamfest in the area.
I got sme SMA Male to Female connectors from him and they have worked great. |
Re: NanoVNA-H v3.6 vs NanoVNA-H4 v4.3 for SWR measurements
Thanks again :-) I've just read it. As there is no guarantee that I will be able to make repeatable measurements I will buy H model for now, make some tests with ground planes, tiger tails and different setups. When all will be well and the measurements start to make sense then I'll think about the upgrade.
Thanks Everyone. |
Re: NanoVNA-H v3.6 vs NanoVNA-H4 v4.3 for SWR measurements
Tish,
This topic was discussed a while ago in this group. I suggest you read the posts in the link below. /g/nanovna-users/topic/80995721#21095 Roger |
Re: NanoVNA-H v3.6 vs NanoVNA-H4 v4.3 for SWR measurements
Hello,
I have both. I have retired the H and now exclusively use the H4. More points to check a frequency range. As far as requiring a metal case, I have compared my H in metal case, and the H4. The results are the same for both. Unless you are in a super noisy environment, a metal case is NOT really needed. Myself, I would buy the H4 again. More features. Clyde KC7BJE |
Re: NanoVNA-H v3.6 vs NanoVNA-H4 v4.3 for SWR measurements
Thank you very much Roger taking your time for explaining me all of that.
Let's say that I will manage to make repeatable measurement on nanoVNA, so without PC, keeping it in the same position and off interference. When you're saying that rubber duck antenna is only have of the system, does it mean that when I mount different antennas to the radio some of them will have higher and some lower SWR than measured on nanoVNA. "you will see the SWR varying all over the place" - is it too optimistic thinking that I can measure if SWR is ~1.5 and not >3.0 or you mean smaller discrepancy? |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss