can't find a suitable #battery connector
#battery
Hi myy NanoVNA was shipped w/o a battery. Thought that's no problem, opened the back cover and realized that my battery doesn't fit into the connector which is installed on the board. You can see it
By
DL8AAP Carsten
·
#7028
·
|
Re: WINDOZE BASED APPS for the NANO VNA
Dave, You are very welcome. :-) -- Rune / 5Q5R
By
Rune Broberg
·
#7027
·
|
Re: Performance of 1:1 Balun
Hi Nan VNA2180 that Steve used have 50 ohm impedance on both ports (A & B). So those formulas will work if vna ports of NanoVNA have 50 ohm impedance. But do they?
By
russianartem@...
·
#7026
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
The crossover point between the real and imaginary part of the complex permeability is a good marker on the usable bandwidth or upper application frequency for the ferrite. Obviously the higher perm
By
alan victor
·
#7025
·
|
Re: Parameter Explanation Please
I am retired and I like to learn new things. I am a ham and l like experimenting with antennas. I am interested in xfmrs for efhw antennas. I have a VNWA and thought it would be fun to play with the
By
Larry Naumann <n0sa@...>
·
#7024
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
David F4HTQ wrote: "finally I do not wait for the weekend :)" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The test method you described seemed simple enough
By
hwalker
·
#7023
·
|
Re: NanoVNA AURSINC v H, Q-0.4.3, images
Because I am new to all this, I'd need some specifics about that. This thread is comparing what is apparently two VNAs from different Chinese sources. I will pull the case in a few days and compare
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#7022
·
|
Re: Replacement Power switch
Check out e-Pay. You can get 50 pcs for $1.25 AND free shipping. 73, Dick, W1KSZ ________________________________ Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 5:34 PM To: [email protected]
By
Dick
·
#7021
·
|
Re: Replacement Power switch
As Herman said, they can be had on eBay https://www.ebay.com/itm/50PCS-Slide-Switch-SK12D07VG2-Toggle-Switch-2mm-Stents-Toggle-Switch-BBC/142724639312?
By
chuckt
·
#7020
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
finally I do not wait for the weekend :) This is the curve for 61 http://alloza.eu/david/WordPress3/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/image-3.png ( one turn of emailled wire on BN61-202) There is the
By
David F4HTQ
·
#7019
·
|
Re: WINDOZE BASED APPS for the NANO VNA
Thanks, Rune. That SW is a downright winner. Thank you!!!!!!! Dave - W?LEV
By
W0LEV
·
#7018
·
|
Re: Replacement Power switch
I would like one or two of those switches.? I live in Los Angeles.? Where did you get them, and are you willing to sell me a few? Bob
By
Bob Albert <bob91343@...>
·
#7017
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
This is the topic that lead me to the nanoVNA https://www.hamradio.me/antennas/where-a-choke-chokes.html
By
chuckt
·
#7016
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi David How is you test setup ? A single short wire thru the core ? Kind regards Kurt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [email protected] <[email protected]> P? vegne af David F4HTQ
By
Kurt Poulsen
·
#7015
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi Herb, For the curve i post as example, i just made one tun of emailled wire of BN43-202 ferrite. I also obtained accurates results with 61 and 73 ferrites materials. (I don't own 31 material). I
By
David F4HTQ
·
#7014
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
That would be permeability. Physics degree not withstanding. I never could keep them straight! Dave - W?LEV [email protected]> wrote:
By
W0LEV
·
#7013
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Yes, what was your setup for the type 43 material permittivity measurement? Dave - W?LEV [email protected]> wrote:
By
W0LEV
·
#7012
·
|
Re: NanoVNA AURSINC v H, Q-0.4.3, images
Yes, for whatever reason you got a lower apparent reflection coefficient on the left-hand unit. This is reflected (so to speak) in the noisier-looking phase trace. Results with an S21 measurement of a
By
Dana Whitlow
·
#7011
·
|
Re: NanoVNA AURSINC v H, Q-0.4.3, images
More images, a puzzle, and some explanation...like real estate, it may be location, location, location To begin, it's true that I was open on CH1, but the image shows that both devices were displaying
By
Rich NE1EE
·
#7010
·
|
Re: NanoVNA AURSINC v H, Q-0.4.3, images
Yes, for whatever reason you got a lower apparent reflection coefficient on the left-hand unit. This is reflected (so to speak) in the noisier-looking phase trace. Results with an S21 measurement of a
By
Dana Whitlow
·
#7009
·
|