¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: NanoVNA AURSINC v H, Q-0.4.3, images


 

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 06:48 PM, Dana Whitlow wrote:
Results with an S21 measurement of a fairly lossy DUT
Because I am new to all this, I'd need some specifics about that.
This thread is comparing what is apparently two VNAs from different Chinese sources. I will pull the case in a few days and compare both internals.
Meanwhile, I used the earlier cal, and mounted an MFJ-1714 tele antenna on a tripod at the end of 3.5 m of RG3416.
AURS left; H, right. Very similar, I think? I made the mistake of not setting the AURS marker on 146 MHz, as I did for the H..
--
73 de Rich NE1EE
On the banks of the Piscataqua

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.