Re: Inductor model
With a 110 uH coil it takes 4.2 pF to resonate at 7.4 MHz. and 1.4 pF to resonate at 12.9 MHz. That is a difference of 2.8 pF which is not much.
One way to get to the bottom of this is to short
By
Roger Need
·
#33302
·
|
Re: Transmission Line Tools
My batch file is for 64 bit systems only.
Try manually copying TeeChart5.ocx to C:\WINDOWS\system32
Then run TLW3.exe
Roger
By
Roger Need
·
#33301
·
|
Re: Transmission Line Tools
Hello Roger,
I have a PC with Windows 7 Pro SP1 32bit (German).
C:\windows\SysWOW64 does not exist on my OS, and your batch file reports an error.
On my 2 other Win10 64bit PCs TLW3 works ok after
By
Robert
·
#33300
·
|
Re: Inductor model
What I wanted to do is not working.
I have an Excel sheet that allows me from the S11 of an antenna to determine its L and C near the resonance by pressing the curve of a plug to pass through two
By
Fran?ois
·
#33299
·
|
Re: Inductor model
Hi Fran?ois
Here is the .s1p file for a range of 1 to 20MHz.
--
Mike G8GYW
By
Mike
·
#33298
·
|
Re: Inductor model
Roger
I compared both methods of calibration, which I refer to as "screws" and "crocs".
At around 72kHz, where the reactance is approximately 50R, both calibration methods give an inductance of
By
Mike
·
#33297
·
|
Re: nanovna-saver crashes with H4
That is a very old version of NanoVNA Saver, download the latest
version and try again.
By
Dragan Milivojevic
·
#33296
·
|
Re: Inductor model
Could you post your .s1p file in shunt on port 0. I would like to reger something.
Have you noticed that when you connect a coil or a trap (finally a dipole) by a single leg on port 0 (the other leg
By
Fran?ois
·
#33295
·
|
Re: Outliers in group delay measurement
Attachments :
- your smoothed file
- the processing log (.CSV) showing the anomalies detected.
- the S21 Group Delay (ns) on the smoothed file
73
--
F1AMM
Fran?ois
De la part de
By
Fran?ois
·
#33294
·
|
Re: S11 ? if Zc complexe
That's it, we have converged. In my application where I am looking for an equality between a value obtained by scanning and a target value, the distance between between the two points (in the complex
By
Fran?ois
·
#33293
·
|
Re: nanovna-saver crashes with H4
Thanks for the info. I do NOT use usc-c to usb-c cables. I use the
standard original usb-a to usb-c. Can you provide a link for the latest
DiSLord code?
Thanks
Fred
By
Fred Moore
·
#33292
·
|
Re: nanovna-saver crashes with H4
I had a similar problem when I had a bad cable or a bad port connection.
Try a different cable, or a different port on the computer. Don't use a
usb-c to usb-c cable, use a usb-a port on your
By
Stan Dye
·
#33291
·
|
Re: S11 ? if Zc complexe
R. A. Chipman, in "Schaum's Outline Series - Theory and Problems of Transmission Lines," McGraw-Hill, 1968, points out that when a lossy transmission line has Zo complex, minimum reflection from the
By
Maynard Wright, P. E., W6PAP
·
#33290
·
|
Re: nanovna-saver crashes with H4
I forgot to mention that the nano 2.8 hardware is on some old software. My
H4 software is also old 1.0.64. It was installed May 31 2021
Fred
By
Fred Moore
·
#33289
·
|
Re: nanovna-saver crashes with H4
My Nano H4 is on a DiSlord version 1.0.64
By
Fred Moore
·
#33288
·
|
Re: Inductor model
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 05:25 PM, Roger Need wrote:
> Calibrating with the crocodile clips will not give you a good reference plane.
> The reason I say this is if you keep them the same distance
By
Mike
·
#33287
·
|
Re: nanovna-saver crashes with H4
What code version(s) are on the NanoVNA's?
By
Tim Dawson
·
#33286
·
|
Re: nanovna-saver crashes with H4
I am confused. A friend of mine and I are trying to figure out why *my
nano H4 and his very early nano vna with the 2.8" screen will both run on
his nano saver 0.3.7.* His 2.8 nano runs on my
By
Fred Moore
·
#33285
·
|
Re: S11 ? if Zc complexe
Indeed..
For instance if Z1 = 2 - 1000j and Z2 is 50 + 100j, then
gamma = (Z1-Z2)/(Z1+Z2)
gamma = 1.215 - 0.124j
|gamma| > 1 (and it's not some sort of numerical precision th
By
Jim Lux
·
#33284
·
|
Re: Outliers in group delay measurement
Here it is, thanks for taking a minute to look into it.
By
astech119
·
#33283
·
|