开云体育

Zack W9SZ wrote: I thought I'd send this e-mail as a curiosity of something I discovered. If you're trying to measure something with the NanoVNA and there is a strong transmitted signal source nearby

Hi Zack, You said “I believe the AA-600 generates a stronger signal that is sent to the DUT. I have suspected this for some time” The AA-600 output level is specified as approximately-10dBm into

Not sure about the obfuscation, but I guess everyone needs some sort of alter ego.

Right! Anne Ranch is a senator (Yeah sure...???) Look it up.

And his name is Vaclav, not Anne. Mike - M0MLM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Clint Sharp [mailto:cjaysharp@...] *Sent:* Sunday, 4 June 2023

You posted incorrect information stating that the software was no longer updated, I did the simplest thing, went and looked at the repository and, sure enough, it proves you wrong. 'Connecting' to

This is where the professional devices excel.? I have an Anritsu SiteMaster and a CellMaster that have the capability of ignoring these extraneous signals. The Anritsu devices send a coded signal up

One of the lesser known issues is transmitter sideband noise. No carrier is perfect as it generates noise eithe side of the carrier and if the carrier is very powerful so the sideband noise is

example measure a 40m dipole and have a strong 41m radio station close .. yes even a signal outside of your normal measure range may cause this (think also on harmonics or unwanted mixing

I can second that as well !? I inherited some old antennas from a defunct CATV head end and have been trying to take what I thought was the easy way out and sweeping them for resonance with my Nano

Yes Zack. Been there done that. Tried outdoor antenna measurements carting a hp vector voltmeter and sig gen. Always saw reflected power greater than incident! Gee an active antenna! Could not get

I have been trying to tune some ferrite rod antennas to a specific frequency. The target frequency is 530 kHz, and for reasons that may be too complicated to describe here, I want to use a fixed

The other adaptation solution and the corresponding Eznec file The intermediate impedance must then be : 81 -j71 ? Does anyone have a ready-made software to calculate this or then it will be

Of course. If the technique is not applicable to your situation, look elsewhere. For other situations, characterizing a system's performance (e.g. DM and CM) using cascaded S-Parameter files can be

You really need to clarify which version of saver you're using, if it is an old version, then it could be out of sync with the improved NanoVNA firmware.

If you look at the "About window, don't you see this line? "For further details, see: https://github.com/NanoVNA-Saver/nanovna-saver" Just click on the URL and you'll enter the home page where you

Ah, a French :) Hello I advanced a little on the subject. To simplify, I will already give the almost satisfactory response. The base of the antenna is : - Frequency = 3.647 MHz Impedance =

Which does not makes sense. The example I mentioned has plenty of data samples when the range is 400 to 500 and it works as expected , but with LESS data to process , when the range is much narrower

Hi Fran?ois, When you do matching HP and LP calculations, you get perfect results at targeted frequencies. That's ok, but don't forget that at 7,1 MHz, you are not in the flat transfer part for HP

It really doesn't matter - the baud rate is a fiction for serial over USB. it's a software fiction that makes a USB link look like a serial interface. Nope - there's no XON/XOFF or CTS/RTS kind of