Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi Karsten, I answer partially instead Rune's. The limitation of 100Hz comes from the firmware, and maybe even hardware. Another solution to determine the motionals parameters of a crystal is to use
By
David F4HTQ
·
#6969
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hello Rune, I am quite new to the group and am already scanning all the messages for information. So please excuse, if I missed the information I am now askig for: Which functions are taken over from
By
Karsten, DD1KT
·
#6968
·
|
Re: Is the NooElec nanoVNA any good?
Thanks to jwd270 and Joe St. Clair AF5MH, I placed my order an hour ago, I've downloaded the lastest firmware and will look into adding the battery voltage diode. I expect to use mine with a netbook
By
Nulluser00@...
·
#6967
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi Rune, Thanks a lot for this fantastic software. The newly added TDR markers are very useful when dealing with roof antennas. :-) Great job. Thanks again Jean
By
ptapon@...
·
#6966
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
@Rune Broberg forgive me Rune, maybe it has already been said a million times but I still have doubts. Let's say I have the nanoVNA turned on "Recall 4". I connect NanoVNA-Saver to the device and the
By
Lucio I8LYL former I0LYL
·
#6965
·
|
Re: NanoVNA software developers wanted
#hacking
I'm using eclipse to edit and the github gui to sync with github. Apart from remembering to save the files you edited because otherwise the make file will not do anything this works well. For eclipse
By
Erik Kaashoek
·
#6964
·
|
Re: Correction menu option ?
Thanks. Interesting to see.
By
Joe St. Clair AF5MH
·
#6962
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Rune, While verifying a cable that I just constructed, I noticed that you had implemented a second marker in the TDR graph. Thanks a lot! Its nice to be able to mark other anomalies, in addition to
By
hwalker
·
#6961
·
|
Re: Added to NanoVNA Wiki Re: DFUseDemo
Yes, you can edit the link I made to your forum post.? ? The trick is that you have to edit the whole wiki page - so please be careful.? Unfortunately, the forum owner disabled the ability to edit
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6960
·
|
Re: Is the NooElec nanoVNA any good?
I agree. I bought one too and my experience was the same.
By
Joe St. Clair AF5MH
·
#6959
·
|
Re: Nanovna-Saver 0.2.0 MAC
Dana, a couple of things. ¡°Older version¡± begs the question - which one? My version of Catalina seems to continue along with Python 3.6. I tried to install 3.7 as recommended as per the
By
Rick Commo
·
#6958
·
|
Re: Added to NanoVNA Wiki Re: DFUseDemo
Thank you Larry. Zadig is usually required to install a driver for an RTL-SDR DVB-T2 TV dongle. I use it often. If you use it incorrectly, you can expect problems with Windows hardware. But the given
By
ON1BES
·
#6957
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. NanaVNA-Saver
#calibration
Rune, I understand that NanoVNA-Saver calibrations aer saved to my computer. Thanks, Mike N2MS
By
Mike N2MS
·
#6956
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. NanaVNA-Saver
#calibration
Hi Mike, you can - but the NanoVNA-Saver calibrations are not saved on the device, but as files on your computer. So I think you understand it right? :-) -- Rune / 5Q5R wrote:
By
Rune Broberg
·
#6955
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Noise improvements. Hugen79's NanoVNA Github Issue #14
#filtering
#noise
#improvement
#hack
#circuit
______________________________________________________________ Gabriel, In my opinion, 3GHz would be great but if you were able to offer reasonable performance to 2.4 GHz to cover the WIFI band, that
By
hwalker
·
#6954
·
|
Re: NanoVNA vs. NanaVNA-Saver
#calibration
Rune, I forgot some information about the NanoVNA Saver Cal: If I calibrate my NanaVNA full span and save it to Cal 0 can I calibrate via NanoVNA Saver the same full span using 10 "Segments" to Cal 0?
By
Mike N2MS
·
#6953
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Noise improvements. Hugen79's NanoVNA Github Issue #14
#filtering
#noise
#improvement
#hack
#circuit
I would really like to see si5351 reach 3GHz ;) We also have a full two port (4 S params at once) design in the pipeline too.
By
OwO
·
#6952
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Noise improvements. Hugen79's NanoVNA Github Issue #14
#filtering
#noise
#improvement
#hack
#circuit
"On the V2 design we worked around 3.3V rail supply noise " --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gabriel, I hope you are able
By
hwalker
·
#6951
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Noise improvements. Hugen79's NanoVNA Github Issue #14
#filtering
#noise
#improvement
#hack
#circuit
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 07:16 AM, Larry Rothman wrote: "There is an interesting discussion on hugen79's NanoVNA Issues page on Github > regarding circuit changes/mods to reduce overall noise levels."
By
hwalker
·
#6950
·
|
Re: NanoVNA Noise improvements. Hugen79's NanoVNA Github Issue #14
#filtering
#noise
#improvement
#hack
#circuit
On the V2 design we worked around 3.3V rail supply noise by using a very wide PLL loop bandwidth (~200kHz), since the noise at the 12kHz IF frequency is impossible to filter out and using an LDO was
By
OwO
·
#6949
·
|