Re: Now at Walmart
Stay far away from this 3rd party seller.? There are typos all throughout their company info and their shipping policy looks strange and has many spelling mistakes as well.? On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at
By
Larry Rothman
·
#6927
·
|
Now at Walmart
I was browsing for something else when this link popped up.
By
DuWayne Schmidlkofer
·
#6926
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Now that the capability is there in the software, how would one use the NanoVNA to check a toroid's permeability? New territory for me... :-)
By
John AE5X
·
#6924
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
@Tom VA7TA Did you change "Display setup / Font / Font size" with too large font? 73, Lucio
By
Lucio I8LYL former I0LYL
·
#6923
·
|
Re: NanoVNA does not want to start -solved
Don't look too far. The chips can be found on Ebay. Search string: 10 PCS IP5305 SOP-8 IP 5305 IC CHIP on1bes Herman
By
ON1BES
·
#6922
·
|
Re: DFUseDemo
I never had to use Zadig in Windows 10 64bit to use DFUseDemo. This is probably a problem by you. Put your Hardware Device Manager window on and examinate following. Try uninstalling Zadig (actually a
By
ON1BES
·
#6921
·
|
DFUseDemo
I am running Windows10 Home 64 Bit, and had DFUsDemo running OK After a firmware update (Erics Version 2.3) suddenly DFUSE Demo no more sees my NanoVNA-H . Windows devicemanager shows the the device
By
Jos Stevens
·
#6920
·
|
Re: coax fatigue
#test-jig
" Just wish it could measure higher impedances more accurately " ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- An HP8753 would not have
By
hwalker
·
#6919
·
|
Re: coax fatigue
#test-jig
Hi I'm a newbie when it comes to the NANOVNA but over the years I have been involved with many different aspects of radio both amuter and professional. SMA connectors are not intended for repeated
By
Raymond Brooks
·
#6918
·
|
Re: coax fatigue
#test-jig
I am thinking that the point of putting the nano in an enclosure is to stabilize the poor isolation, not necessarily to eliminate it. But when the nano's leak is stabilized, the ISOL CAL should then
By
Dana Whitlow
·
#6917
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
Hi Rune, Many thanks again for your ongoing development of nanoVNA-Saver - fabulous work! I am not sure if I should waste your time reporting this as it is not a significant issue....just apple
By
Tom VA7TA
·
#6916
·
|
Re: Correction menu option ?
When trying to evaluate / improve upon firmware calibration by experiments with uncorrected data on hosts, e.g. /g/nanovna-users/message/6696
By
Oristo
·
#6915
·
|
Re: coax fatigue
#test-jig
Thanks for doing the test Nick! I guess we are all having a great time working with this little unit. I was considering buying an 8753 and retrofitting it with an after-marked LCD display but I think
By
WB2UAQ
·
#6914
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
I guess STM32CubeMX integration and STM support are main claims to fame for STM32CUBEIDE, which otherwise is another customization of ECLIPSE?/CDT IDE. NanoVNA uses ChibiOS, which has a dedicated
By
Oristo
·
#6913
·
|
Re: errors of "error" models
[ann] next-to-come : on the measurement of s-parameters using the [LeastVNA] only
By
gin&pez@arg
·
#6912
·
|
Re: Correction menu option ?
Why would you want to ever disable this?
By
Joe St. Clair AF5MH
·
#6911
·
|
Re: [nanovna-f] NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
An excellent piece of software just got better. Congratulations and thanks for your efforts !73 de YO4AUL
By
Corneliu
·
#6910
·
|
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.2.0
This is a little off topic however I reply to the question on firmware development enviroment. I am using the free STM32CUBEIDE from ST Micro the Mc manufacture to build some SDR control code for a
By
William Heller
·
#6909
·
|
Re: Metal enlosure vs stability
#enclosure
#stability
#shielding
#calibration
Golden rule of reducing uncertainty, use the connector type that you will be using to connect directly to the equipment / antenna that you test. Otherwise, I'd need more adapters to connect to a
By
Andy <punkbiscuit@...>
·
#6908
·
|
Re: Metal enlosure vs stability
#enclosure
#stability
#shielding
#calibration
yes, UHF connectors have terrible performance even on HF
By
QRP RX
·
#6907
·
|