¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

You're right, there seems to be an old 0.0.10 in the files area. I have reported it to the admins to have it removed. The old versions are available on GitHub, but there's no reason they should be

Hi sala nimi, The latest version is 0.1.2 which you can get at https://github.com/mihtjel/nanovna-saver/releases/ -- Bryan, WA5VAH

I think I just installed the version 0.12 while there is version 0.10 in files. Version numbers with a lot of .... are a bit misleading, so I am not 100% sure.

Preferably, with a 50 ohm load on both ports. If you only have one, put it on "ch1" (port 2 - confusing numbering). Isolation tries to establish and cancel out the base level of noise in the passive

For your info. There are calibration kits in Ebay where the center pin does not rotate while attaching the connector. Price was about 13€?$

I am using NanoVna saver software and the last action in the calibration dialog is "isolation". How do I do it or how it differs from "open" calibration? Regards LM

...and attached is the missing screenshot...

Thanks very much, Cecil. I've been too chicken to attempt updating the firmware. Maybe it's time to bite the bullet. Mel -- edy 0.2.3 is *firmware* that would need to be downloaded onto the NanoVNA

Please be aware both code space and ram are almost full. Any big additional functionality will imply taking out other functionality possibly leading to PC side incompatibility. Do not dig a private

The SA612 currently run on 5volt. Max is 8 volt. Will not make a big difference in performance. IIP3 and 1DBC improvement but more noise. Will do some more testing.

Thanks Jeff, near but not quite, It gives the R in terms of ohms, but the X in terms of pF?? Yes I can get there, but it would be nice to see the Mag R in ohms and the X in terms of j like my itger

Would ¡°uncertainty of errors correction terms¡± not be a better title?

Please explain edy 0.2.3 SW Thanks Mel, K6KBE

Jeff, I'm running edy 0.2.3 and it will display R and X.

At 200 MHz it appears to be 55 dB (see attached picture).

#45 : errors instead of "errors" : [NanoVNA] Indications for "standard" Nominal Values Hello, Allow us, please, to demonstrate the big difference between Indications and Nominal Values for [AnyVNA],

Herb, John Gord is on the right track about the phase. To be a bit more specific, the phase angle from -180 to 180 degrees in Excel is converted using atan2(im,re) which is the four quadrant arc

Erik, photos at msg 4295. A local regulator is used, adjacent to the mixer. Maybe a separate, local regulator could be used at each mixer to decouple them from the common supply? Awaiting your

Ltd <drkirkby@...> wrote: I hesitate to /instruct/ anyone on firmware, but I have some thoughts to share. tl;dr There is a minimum set of skills that should be in place before

Hi Mel, good to see you (and your Bauer) on the group. I just took a look at my NanoVNA (which I've had for a month or two, so it doesn't have the latest firmware), and I don't see any way to display