¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

Generator threshold value must be less then default 300M, need more detail see work in range 270 - 300M (reset calibration and see in this range)
From there threshold start problem.

After write it to CONFIG->EXPERT SETTING->THRESHOLD
After need save CONFIG->SAVE CONFIG


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

Here at the pics. The green lines are moving.
You have no trace information or markers displayed. See the orange box below to see what I mean.

If you did a software update you might need to do a Clear Config to flush out the old settings. It is under the expert settings and if you need a password it is 1234

Roger


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:50 AM, TE Dukes wrote:


Here at the pics. The green lines are moving.
I have a hunch it might be the harmonic mode that is having problems. Try calibrating from 50 kHz. to 200 MHz and see if it improves.

Roger


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

try to do your sweeps with some averaging (means more points/values per measure point are takern and interpolated) ... that make the curves more even

you even can do the calib with high avg .. and measure then with lower avg (on none at all)

are your connectors tight?? what cable do you use?? are those values jumping around if you move cables a bit (wiggle on them)???

that you have those waves at the lower end and straight lines on the rest of the scan is not normal

dg9bfc sigi

Am 30.08.2022 um 19:11 schrieb TE Dukes:

Thanks!!

I watched the video and did the calibration along with the guy. My menus are a little different than his. I don't have the choice of 'CORRECTION'. I think the equivalent on mine is 'Apply".

Anyway, the points are where they are supposed to be BUT I have green lines coming out of each point jumping around. Pretty sure its not supposed to be doing that.

Any ideas?

Thanks




Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

HA!! Didn't know I could do that!!

Here at the pics. The green lines are moving.

Thanks!!


Re: Anything for Windows 7?

 

why not use w10?? ... most if not all software for w7 should also work on w10

dg9bfc sigi

Am 30.08.2022 um 19:39 schrieb Leif M:

I still use W7 because most of my software is there. Nano VNA software for W7 would be nice too.




Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

You can take screenshots using nanoVNA app by just connecting to your nanoVNA and clicking the camera button.

Roger


Anything for Windows 7?

 

I still use W7 because most of my software is there. Nano VNA software for W7 would be nice too.


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:11 AM, TE Dukes wrote:


Anyway, the points are where they are supposed to be BUT I have green lines
coming out of each point jumping around. Pretty sure its not supposed to be
doing that.
Here are some screenshots of short, open and load after calibration. Post yours for comparison

Roger


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

Right, the frequency range is a little wider than the range/points I want to check. Range is 460Mhz to 470Mhz and I want to check 462.550Mhz and 467.550Mhz.

Thanks


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

Thanks!!

I watched the video and did the calibration along with the guy. My menus are a little different than his. I don't have the choice of 'CORRECTION'. I think the equivalent on mine is 'Apply".

Anyway, the points are where they are supposed to be BUT I have green lines coming out of each point jumping around. Pretty sure its not supposed to be doing that.

Any ideas?

Thanks


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

On 8/29/22 6:40 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
What I'm wanting to do is to check a dupexler I have coming in the next week or so to make sure its tuned close the frequencies I requested.
I know this is not the ideal way to do it but I don't have $12K for a Tektronic VNA.
Attached are the pics.
Thanks, really appreciate the help!!
My first guess is that the frequency range used for calibration is different than the frequency range used for the measurement.


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

I suggest you use the nanoVNA in stand-alone mode (without a PC) in order to test it out.
Do a calibration over a wide range like 50 kHz. to 900 MHz. and then check it using the cal loads and the Smith Chart.
Short should be a dot on far left of horizontal axis
50 ohm load should be a dot in center of Smith chart
Open should be a dot on far right of horizontal axis

Watch this video for the complete procedure.

Roger


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

I know about several problems in 450-480MHz range.
Try calibrate in 300-600MHz, but measure in 460-470MHz

PS on screenshot i see you use NanoVNA-App calibration mode (so you calibrate in it?)


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

Actually I started with Slackware 1.0 but moved to RH 2.0. Been a long time ago, my memory may be off on the date.


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

Yes, I re-did the calibration on nanovna itself as well as in the App.


Re: NanoVNA App - Installation and Use #applications

 

works fine here

dg9bfc sigi

Am 26.08.2022 um 12:32 schrieb Goebel, Klaus:

I use the NanoVNA-App v1.1.209 (build by Owen Duffy) together with a NanoVNA V2Plus4 running the current DiSlord firmware (v1.3.07, see first screenshot). I noticed that coloured screenshots look strange (see second screenshot). Is there a workaround for this?

Klaus




Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

You recalibrate device after?


Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

Linux was released in 1991, RH came a few years later.

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 at 03:44, TE Dukes <tdukes@...> wrote:

Thanks for the info. Never been one to go with the latest and the
greatest. Been running RedHat Linux since about 1991. I always go with
'stable'.




Re: Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

 

Thanks for the info. Never been one to go with the latest and the greatest. Been running RedHat Linux since about 1991. I always go with 'stable'.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Siegfried Jackstien
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 9:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [nanovna-users] Newbie NanoVNA question regarding calibration

hmm ... as far as i know the version from dislord is more actual (12 days old) and displord also is making new fw fro nanovna v2 (and some other clones,brothers,sisters, cousins)

version from oen duffy is 209-od12 ... version from dislord is 210 (mod by dislord)

i think that you will have less compatibility problems if you use fw and pc soft from same guy (and if not you have only one person to ask for a change or to write issues in github)

greetz sigi dg9bfc

ps .. if you want newest fw join the beta test group

/g/nanovna-beta-test

Am 30.08.2022 um 00:51 schrieb Roger Need via groups.io:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 02:47 PM, Siegfried Jackstien wrote:

1.0.69 for your H4 is outdated

as is nano vna app (displord version 210 is most actual)

you find it here


A-App.exe
I prefer the latest NanoVNA app fork by Owen Duffy. He incorporates some of DiSlord's changes and fixed the "info" parameters so they now work correctly when you hover over the data.




Roger