Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: USING THE NANOVNA AND SAVER TO MEASURE CM ATTENUATION THROUGH CMCs
Hardware capability? What are you referring to?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
On 2/2/21 1:46 PM, David Eckhardt wrote:
What the dickens are "Squarers"? I'll confess the ISM bands are a good It is legal to run an unlicensed transmitter on 13.56, as long as the power is low enough (i.e. meets Part 15). A few mW is typical, and as sunspots heat up, you could "work the world" with suitable modulation. And to keep it notionally nanoVNA centric, at that power level, every little bit helps when it comes to designing and match, although the goal isn't low DC power, it's to keep the radiated power below the FCC limit (some 10-20 mV/meter, as I recall). A NanoVNA might make a handy way to actually measure that radiated field. (or, at least, the antenna efficiency) by using a calibrated antenna on the other port and measuring S21. |
What the dickens are "Squarers"? I'll confess the ISM bands are a good
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
place to hide possibly illegal and unlicensed emissions. However, as a licensed ham for some 61 years and worked professionally in the EMC regulatory world for some 35 years, I can not condone the practice. Dave - W?LEV On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 9:19 PM Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@...> wrote:
Probably has nothing to do with his use, but 13.56 MHz and surrounding --
*Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
Re: [Ham-Antennas] USING THE NANOVNA AND SAVER TO MEASURE CM ATTENUATION THROUGH CMCs
Gary,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
IF the alternative RF path is down a pair of antenna wires near a feed point where the equivalent impedance is ~75 Ohms, then 3K ohms looks very good. On the other hand if end-feeding and using the choke to hold back the RF on the feedline, then RF impedance at the point of the choke might be >2k Ohms and 3K ohms is hopeless. This is why my original post of my results attempted to measure the series impedance (mostly inductive) at various frequencies within the amateur bands of my CMCs (using the HP-9753C VNA). I use a 450-foot long doublet fed with (mostly) 400-ohm parallel conductor transmission line (about 65-feet total of that Xline). As such, the impedance presented here in the shack is all over the Smith Chart. I could evaluate the effectiveness of my chokes only by knowing the series Z they presented and the impedance of the antenna/feedline presented in the shack. Others wanted to see the attenuation of CM energy as measured in a 50-ohm system. That's why I presented that measurement in the second set of measurements I sent out yesterday. Used as I do, every installation in the world will be different. The impedance of my antenna does not hit the real axis of the chart anywhere in the amateur bands. The lowest frequency 1/2-wavelength resonance (with a bit of capacitive end loading) is roughly 950 kHz in the bottom third of the AM BCB. My w/c impedance is on 40-meters: 1000 - j 1100 ohms. In my installations, I believe a better metric with which to measure the performance of my CMCs is the balance between current going up and back on the parallel line transmission line. I have built a small piece of equipemt to measure just that. I've also taken each CMC and using an o'scope and a signal generator measured the balance of amplitude and phase reversal from the two DM ports with CM drive from the signal generator. That has not appeared in my measurements as I'm trying to stick with the NANOVNAs. The antenna where I was trying to use this was in between those extremes, but the NEC model run suggested that I was losing about 40% of my power to/through the choke on 160. The final test I put my CMCs through is in place between the output of the matching network (L-network) and the parallel conductor transmission line to the set of wires *at power*. I start with around 400-watts. That caught one CMC wound with house wiring insulated with PVC - bad heating of the insulation. It was eventually unwound. Those wound with solid AWG #12 solid enamelled copper conductors exhibited bad coronal discharge between winding pairs of the line on the cores. If you are, indeed, losing 40% of your power on 160-meters at 100- watts, I'd expect some major amount of heating would be evident. If not, something in the model is missing. Several decades ago, I started with CMC wound on a large core of 43 material using RG-142 coax. That the 'high power' teflon insulated, silver plated conductor 50-ohm coax. I finally came to realize its only function was to present a large inductive reactance to the CM energy on my transmission line. A choke wound in bifilar manner accomplishes that in addition to ensuring the currents cancel within the core which forces CM energy passing unattenuated through the core - the DM energy. Therefore, all my chokes of resent build have been bifilar windings on the cores. Dave - W?LEV On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:40 PM Gary Rondeau <grondeau@...> wrote:
Dave, --
*Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
On 2/2/21 1:10 PM, David Eckhardt wrote:
13.56 MHz is an ISM (Industrial, Scientific, and Medical) frequency. ThereRFID uses 13.56 MHz with radiated fields (limited, it's true), but all those "near field communications" things are also 13.56 (Subway cards, cashless payments, etc.). If you're making a "long range" reader (e.g. for a doorway portal application) you wind up with directive arrays of some sort, but you also run into problems with RFI.
|
Re: USING THE NANOVNA AND SAVER TO MEASURE CM ATTENUATION THROUGH CMCs
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 02:00 PM, David Eckhardt wrote:
I promised this, so here it is. See the attachment for a procedure toDave, The measurement of common mode attenuation as it pertains to baluns and RF chokes has been discussed in this group several times and there is a lot of good info in those posts. Reading through these and other excellent references on the Internet one can see the two main areas of concern... - How to measure common mode impedance accurately - Does measuring common mode impedance reflect what happens to common mode current reduction in an antenna system? Let me start with the latter. Several well-known authors on this subject (Tom Roach (W8JI), Jim Brown (K9YC), Owen Duffy(VK1OD), Jeff Anderson (K6JCA) and Steve Hunt (G3TXQ -SK) all stress that knowing the magnitude of the impedance |Z| is not a useful indicator of how well a balun or RF choke will reduce common mode current. As a minimum we need to know the complex impedance R+/-jX and even this only gives a subjective answer. If the choking impedance is primarily reactive the common mode current could get worse depending on the feedpoint impedance of the antenna. What is effective is if the resistance is high and how high is a subject of debate. What is generally accepted is that if common mode impedance |Z| is less than 500 ohms it will be a poor solution. Also there is no direct relationship between the common mode impedance of the RF choke and balun and the reduction in common mode current that would be measured when installed in an antenna system. The second issue is how to measure common mode impedance accurately. It is relatively easy to determine the magnitude of the impedance |Z| using S21 but even that requires careful jig construction especially if we want to make measurements higher than HF. The complex impedance (R+/-jX) can be determined by several methods: S11 or S21. The problem with the S21 measurement method is that it requires additional calculations to determine R+/-jX and the NanoVNA does not have the hardware capability to do this accurately. However S11 measurements can be made on the NanoVNA to determine R+/-jX but the estimate gets poor if we go much beyond 1000 ohms. Just like S21 measurements the test fixture should be built to minimize parasitics and be calibrated with suitable loads. Rather than repeat what the authors above have written on this subject I suggest readers take a look at this post by K6JCA which has a lot of theoretical background, measurements and an extensive reference list. Roger |
Probably has nothing to do with his use, but 13.56 MHz and surrounding
frequencies on shortwave are the homes of many unlicensed CW beacons. Many are "squarers." Zack W9SZ On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 8:52 AM Jim Lux <jim@...> wrote: On 2/2/21 5:04 AM, brown.beard.2020@... wrote:<>Hi Allmore suitable place for my questions. Virus-free. www.avg.com <> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> |
13.56 MHz is an ISM (Industrial, Scientific, and Medical) frequency. There
are 7 frequencies allocated by the FCC for that purpose in that specific ISM band - in a NON_RADIATIVE MANNER. Why are you connecting an antenna to a 13.56 MHz source? Most of the MetCal soldering stations operate on 13.56 MHz. Dave - W?LEV On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 8:57 PM Jim Allyn - N7JA <jim@...> wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 05:54 AM, <brown.beard.2020@...> wrote:--I have an antenna connected to a 13.56MHz RF signal and would like toadd aferrite core to the cable from the antenna to the device to filter outanynoise coming from the environment. *Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 05:54 AM, <brown.beard.2020@...> wrote:
I have an antenna connected to a 13.56MHz RF signal and would like to add a It isn't clear to me what the situation is here. Do you mean you have an antenna connected to a 13.56 MHz signal coming from a signal generator or transmitter of some sort, and you wish to transmit that13.56 MHz signal? Or, you have an antenna you are using to receive a 13.56 MHz signal, and you would like to prevent interference picked up by the transmission line from being brought into the shack? Or you have something else (NOT 13.56 MHz) you are trying to receive and the 13.56 MHz signal is interfering with it? Please clarify. |
Re: USING THE NANOVNA AND SAVER TO MEASURE CM ATTENUATION THROUGH CMCs
For those that may use Google, Google Docs will read and create DOCX files.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
*Clyde K. Spencer* On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 3:18 PM Jim Lux <jim@...> wrote:
On 2/2/21 10:17 AM, David Eckhardt wrote:oooops. When I send them to the files section, I shall do so. ThanksI suspect it's MS Word vs something else. |
Re: Antenna QUIZ (to help interpret NANO VNA graphs) de k3eui Barry
The simplest book which covers the proper subjects with as little calculus
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
as I've seen is: Surprisingly enough, MFJ has an excellent resource. I picked up a copy at HRO a couple of years ago, well before the COVID thing. It's a bit terse in treatments, but its pretty good: *ANTENNAS AND TRANSMISSION LINES* by John A. Kuecken, Published: MFJ, First edition, 2nd printing ......... no ISBN number While one can hardly treat the subject without a little calculus, he has kept it to a minimum. However, a solid and working knowledge of algebra and trigonometry is required. If you ae looking for a reference with absolutely no calculus and still treats the necessary subjects properly, your out of luck. The book published by MFJ is about as close to that as I've come across and is still responsible to engineering and physics. Even the J. D. Kraus *ANTENNAS* requires calculus. Without that math tool, you're up a creek as E&M requires calculus. Try the MJF book. I believe it's the best on the present market with minimal math. Or take the plunge and learn a bit of good solid math. Life-long learning is golden, especially in retirement. Dave - W?LEV On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:36 PM Dave Daniel <kc0wjn@...> wrote:
Having not seen or read that book, I can¡¯t say. Perhaps someone else on --
*Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
Re: USING THE NANOVNA AND SAVER TO MEASURE CM ATTENUATION THROUGH CMCs
Eric Furness
On 2/2/2021 3:18 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
On 2/2/21 10:17 AM, David Eckhardt wrote:Eric WA3UYIoooops.? When I send them to the files section, I shall do so.??? ThanksI suspect it's MS Word vs something else. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. |
Re: USING THE NANOVNA AND SAVER TO MEASURE CM ATTENUATION THROUGH CMCs
On 2/2/21 10:17 AM, David Eckhardt wrote:
oooops. When I send them to the files section, I shall do so. ThanksI suspect it's MS Word vs something else. .docx works just fine on Mac OS, but you need MS Word. Dave |
Re: Antenna QUIZ (to help interpret NANO VNA graphs) de k3eui Barry
Having not seen or read that book, I can¡¯t say. Perhaps someone else on the list can answer that.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
DaveD On Feb 2, 2021, at 14:15, Cierra <dubosec@...> wrote: |
Re: Antenna QUIZ (to help interpret NANO VNA graphs) de k3eui Barry
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:21 AM, Dave Daniel wrote: Does something like the Practical Antenna Handbook by Carr and Hippisley provide a good overview of antennas for a ham without a background in calculus? I can't exactly undertake a graduate-level study of the topic at the moment, haha.
|
Re: Antenna QUIZ (to help interpret NANO VNA graphs) de k3eui Barry
I have not done so but certainly can. I take the practical approach that
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
it's what the system presents to the input of the L-network matching network with the CMC between the feeder and the network input. Do I really care what the feedpoint looks like? Yes, from a modelling and total system characterization, I do, but from a strictly practical viewpoint, it doesn't matter. Dave - W?LEV On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 6:42 PM AG6CX <edwmccann@...> wrote:
David: --
*Dave - W?LEV* *Just Let Darwin Work* |
Re: Antenna QUIZ (to help interpret NANO VNA graphs) de k3eui Barry
David:
And if you ¡°subtract¡± effect of your X feet of feed using your analyzer (or Zplots or whatever) out of curiosity what are the impedances at your same various frequencies at the feedpoint of the 450 foot doublet? Any conclusions from a comparison? Ed McCann AG6CX |
Re: [nanovnav2] USING THE NANOVNA AND SAVER TO MEASURE CM ATTENUATION THROUGH CMCs
Attachments were lost in the forward.
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 18:41, Dragan Milivojevic via groups.io <d.milivojevic@...> wrote: On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 18:37, Dragan Milivojevi? <d.milivojevic@...> |
Be careful not to apply too much pressure when tightening the N Connector as it not securely fastened. The N Connector is soldered to the internal SMA. I ASSumed when I looked at mine that the N Connector was held in place to the metal chassis but it's not, only has the one nut on outside holding the plate in. You can add a thinner nut to the inside which will make the connector more secure.
|