Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Nanovna-Users
- Messages
Search
Re: Where to buy "DeepVNA" (NanoVNA-F 4.3 screen aluminum enclosure}
I also use the NanoVNA-F for outdoor operation. Make sure you get the latest version with push button switches instead of the thumbwheel switch. It's a lot easier to use the push button when your hand are cold.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Mike N2MS On 02/02/2023 9:09 AM DougVL <k8rftradio@...> wrote: |
VNA_QT Issue
I posted this question on the nanovnav2 group. This group has a wider audience so I will ask it here.
In the past was able to connect to VNA_QT with my NanoVNA V2 Plus4. I recently tried; the VNA_QT detects the correct COM port but does not connect. I get this exception message. See attachment. The NanoVNA V2 Plus4 works with the NanoVNA Saver 0.5.4 and NanoVNA-APP-1-1-213 applications. The NanoVNA V2 Plus4 has software version 20220301. Any ideas? I tried reinstalling the Cypress driver and it still does not connect I use VNA_QT to upgrade the firmware, Is these another method of upgrading the firmware? 73 Mike N2MS |
Re: Where to buy "DeepVNA" (NanoVNA-F 4.3 screen aluminum enclosure}
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 08:02 AM, Clyde Spencer wrote:
I bought an early 2.8" nanovna, but found it to be unusable outdoors. So then I ordered the NanoVNA-F, and it does need to be shaded, but is much more usable outside. Different Groups.IO group, though, and different firmware developer. -- Doug, K8RFT |
Re: Where to buy "DeepVNA" (NanoVNA-F 4.3 screen aluminum enclosure}
When talking about the DeepVNA 101 you need to use the NanoVNA-F groups.io
link. [email protected] *Clyde K. Spencer* On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 8:03 AM Clyde Spencer via groups.io <cftr01b= [email protected]> wrote: It is not exceptional but is better than the other NanoVNAs on the market. |
Re: Where to buy "DeepVNA" (NanoVNA-F 4.3 screen aluminum enclosure}
It is not exceptional but is better than the other NanoVNAs on the market.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I have used it outside but you have to shade the display. *Clyde K. Spencer* On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 6:33 PM Ken <ko6no@...> wrote:
Has anyone used this model outdoors? How readable is it in bright light? |
Latest DiSlord's firmware where I find it
Hello
I have a nanoVNA SAA-2N HW V2_2 and I like to use the newest version of DiSlord firmware. On this occasion I want to thank him for the hard work he is doing. DiSlord's latest firmware version seems to be V1.3.12 but I can't find it. Can anyone help me with a link to it? Photos of my SAA-2N HW V2_2 for proper ID below. Thanks for any help. -- Eugen? - YO9WHI |
Re: RF Demo Kit for NanoVNA H4?
#nanovna-h4
On 01/02/2023 20:25, Donald S Brant Jr wrote:
Get. The. Proper. Tool.Do you have a URL for purchase, please? A quick search on Amazon and AliExpress was fruitless, and eBay gave: Harley Davidson tool box mount kit U FL EL VT 31-0578 which wasn't right. Otherwise ~US $36. 73, David GM8ARV -- SatSignal Software - Quality software for you Web: Email: david-taylor@... Twitter: @gm8arv |
Re: Start/stop points for HF SWR measurement
For your first question, regarding how wide is too wide for HF VSWR
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
measurements: I have one saved calibration setup from 1MHz - 30MHz, which I use to see the basic characteristics of a multiband HF vertical antenna (i.e. do I see good dips on all the bands it is made for). Then I often set the range smaller to see more closely what the VSWR is at my desired part of just one or two bands. This works fine, no need to recalibrate for this general VSWR use. Note that the nanovna firmware interpolates quite well between calibration points, so reasonably accurate VSWR results are given. Note also that the frequency position of the VSWR 'dips' (minimums) is not dependent on calibration - finer calibration will only give a bit more accuracy of the value of the SWR at that frequency. So for this HF VSWR purpose, a single saved calibration works well across the HF bands. You can experiment with this, by doing a detailed calibration for just one band, say 13.5-14.5MHz, and comparing the VSWR value with what you get from the 1-30MHz calibration, and you won't see large differences. However, if you are doing other measurements, e.g. ones that require specific complex impedance values, you should always calibrate over the frequency range you are measuring. For your second question, regarding number of points: Note that with recent firmware, many nanovna hardware models support 401 points. It sounds like that is what you have, since you are getting 2.5kHz steps across a 1MHz range. The actual number of points used is settable via the menus. Which version of firmware do you have? and which model of nanovna? (can be seen on the startup screen, or on the config->version menu screen for more recent firmware). I hope that helps a bit. On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 5:35 PM Bill Klymus W5PB <bktx75@...> wrote:
I know that the nanoVNA has about 101 (measurement points between the |
Re: Start/stop points for HF SWR measurement
Actually, with 101 points there are 100 spaces, so divide the range by 100 to see the spacing.
I didn't write the code, but I suspect that the graphics engine interpolates between actual measurement points. If you set the range so that the spacing is too wide, you may miss something in between the points. |
Start/stop points for HF SWR measurement
I know that the nanoVNA has about 101 (measurement points between the start and stop frequencies. When using it for SWR measurements of an HF antenna, how wide is too wide? Should each band be framed separately? Or is it ok to combine bands to save memory slots? For example, instead of having separate memories for 20, 30, and 40 meters, would I still get a useable reading if I combined them into one memory (start at 7 MHz and stop at 14.35).
Which brings up another question: If I set the start frequency at, say 6.5 MHz and the stop frequency at 7.5, and there are 101 measurement points, that means each point should be 9.9KHz apart. However, the marker moves in 2.5 KHz increments. Is it just implying what the SWR should be at these points? |
Re: Group Co-ownership Change
You can always spot the programmers... If they need to say go to:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
They actually say: Goto: ... 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources On 2/1/23 15:30, Tim Dawson wrote:
struct Daves |
Re: Group Co-ownership Change
They are probably of a "certain age".
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, Gary - W6GVS At 07:19 PM 2/1/2023, you wrote:
Really???? |
Re: Group Co-ownership Change
Really????
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dave E On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 12:10 AM Dave Daniel <kc0wjn@...> wrote:
We are all older than 25.-- *Dave - W?LEV* --
Dave - W?LEV |
Re: Group Co-ownership Change
We are all older than 25.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
DaveD On Feb 1, 2023, at 18:56, W0LEV <davearea51a@...> wrote: |
Re: Group Co-ownership Change
Yes, I've heard rumored that one could determine one's age by noting the
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
first name. Yes, Dave D and Dave E are "about" the same age (we used to work together). How about Dave F? Dave E - W?LEV On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 11:06 PM Dave Daniel <kc0wjn@...> wrote:
Yeah, Dr. Seuss even wrote a story about ¡°too many Daves¡±.-- *Dave - W?LEV* --
Dave - W?LEV |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss