Not all.? I just think it's funny how easily people will rationalize their behavior, and I'm referring to the guy who started this thread as well as the guy who thinks W0RW isn't engaging in copyright abuse. ? Some of the other comments on free use have been informative for me, but I still think it's telling that nobody has thought to simply ask the author of the article for a free summary of his conclusions.
I don't know what links you referring to either .... I don't believe I've posted any relative to this thread.
73,
Dave?? AB7E
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 12/22/2019 6:00 PM, Frank Howell wrote:
Wow, Dave! You got in the bus very late, didn¡¯t you?
NONE of us are interested in this new QEX article for VNA theory! It¡¯s about the empirical comparison of the NanoVNA versus other higher grade VNAs. Do you get that difference? I¡¯ve got about a GB of books and articles (including the ones you¡¯ve put links to instead of actually reading this thread) on VNA theory, tutorials, user & service manuals, etc.
Way back on Saturday Night Live, Emily Litella used to get in the bus late, too. But when she caught on, she exclaimed, Never mind!
What¡¯s in your wallet? Lol
