On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:05 PM, Rich NE1EE wrote:
You are correct. I seemed to be having difficulty calibrating with
NanoVNA-Q-0.4.2-bf9c4ba
That's very interesting. Calibration with NanoVNA-Q should be a little better than with NanoVNA-H firmware.
Can you show me please screenshot of NanoVNA-Q with CH0 LOGMAG and CH1 LOGMAG after CAL RESET (with no calibration) for 50 kHz - 1500 MHz range?
