Well, I believe there is already a mobile app available for the NanoVNA?
Having a mobile version would be fine, and I'm not doing anything to
actively prevent it - ;-) - but I'm also not spending time actively working
on it while I have a long list of things I want to do with the PC version.
At least for now, I think supporting Windows, Mac and Linux is going to be
it for me personally.
--
Rune / 5Q5R
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 at 15:35, Oristo <ormpoa@...> wrote:
Hi Rune -
I'm not trying to convert anyone
Any consideration of mobile (iOS / Android) versions?
QT5 and Python are both supported on both, after a fashion...
Imagining that nanoVNA evolution forks,
a low-end Bluetooth dongle (picoVNA?)
could be cheaper with longer battery life
and UI focused on hosts where UI rules.
