On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 01:15, Kurt Poulsen <kurt@...> wrote:
Hi David
I think you should read my response to this question.
You negative conclusion is not valid.
Pragmatic solution are still useable and in addition using the
NanoVNA-saver you got it all to perfection.
Yes, but NanoVNA-saver doesn¡¯t give one a *stand-alone, self contained unit*
like an Agilent FieldFox. Personally I don¡¯t want to have to use an
external computer with the NanoVNA.
I obtained a couple of those T-shaped calibration standards with an open,
short and load. I paid less than $50 each. A few user-defined calibration
kits solves the problem.
*You and I have very different intended uses. I think we will just have to
agree to differ *
1) You wish to use it as a data collection device and do the processing in
software on a PC - much like the VNWA
2) I want to be able to use it outside, without having an external PC.
The Agilent FieldFox gives the best of both worlds.
* Totally self contained, so maybe used without any PC.
* Software that allows one stream data directly to a PC if one wishes.
Dave.
--
Dr. David Kirkby,
Kirkby Microwave Ltd,
drkirkby@...
Telephone 01621-680100./ +44 1621 680100
Registered in England & Wales, company number 08914892.
Registered office:
Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Althorne, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT, United
Kingdom
