Because anyone can read at will, and there is no charge to do so. If there are any 3rd party contributions, it is questionable whether any copyright could apply to that as well.
It also comes into question if he really cared that much about copyright, or just grabbed that jibber and spew from another site since it looked good . . .
(Not sure on this one) I also wonder, since copyright is effectively ownership (prevent others from claiming/profiting from your work) if it were presented with full credit and zero financial issue, is it protected?
Not sure - I just can't fathon anyone spending more that 3 seconds disputing something that earned him nothing (but would cost quite a bit to defend). It just seems to violate the entire spirit and attitude of Ham radio by about 97 percent . . .
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On January 31, 2025 5:33:50 PM EST, Tom KG3V <KG3V@...> wrote:
I have not been following this real closely, but why do you say it was released to "public domain?" I saw a clear Copyright notice with "all rights reserved" last time I looked at that blog.
73,
Tom, KG3V
On 1/31/25 14:15, Tim Dawson wrote:
Not sure there is any path there, since it was released to the public domain.
It would be the same as stopping publication of a book, and demanding that all existing copies be destroyed - purely nonsensical.
"Fair use" is also a factor.
- Tim
On 1/31/25 13:57, arnold slag via groups.io wrote:
It's backed up so hurry and pick before he will give a notice and take down:
Op ma 27 jan 2025, 16:47 schreef Fred_M via groups.io <dl4zao=
[email protected]>:
Sad news:
(mostly electronics) is no longer available.
regards
Fred
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
