By the way, for my needs, I would like an instrument that goes from 100 kHz to at lease 1 GHz.
Burt, K6OQK
At 02:20 PM 9/29/2019, you wrote:
Once again, I vote for a larger version. As I said earlier, I would like one to be tablet size and with Type-N connectors. I suspect that I'd probably be willing to pay a fair price for a larger, more robust instrument. I typically use my RF test equipment of this type in the field, rarely if ever up a tower, often at the tower base, not so much on the bench. I want something I can easily see and use a touch screen that works with real fingers, not fingers I have to first stick in a pencil sharpener.
The idea of using the nanoVNA in conjunction with a phone for a larger screen or a tablet for a tablet size screen does not appeal to me. For me, a VNA is a tool, not a project - making an antenna work properly is the project.
Burt, K6OQK
At 01:37 PM 9/29/2019, you wrote:
In my opinion, it could be a bit larger with a larger screen and still be fine for portable or field use.? Just look at the Keysight Field Fox...
Mike WY6K
"... somewhere in the distance, there's a tower and a light, broadcastin' the resistance, through the rain and through the night..."
On Sunday, September 29, 2019, 3:22:33 PM CDT, Bo, OZ2M <groups.io@...> wrote:
Hi
Personally I am not at all sensitive to the form factor. My use is 99% lab use and 1% antenna/portable use.
I wonder how many actually wants a small form factor.
Bo
Burt I. Weiner Associates
Broadcast Technical Services
Glendale, California U.S.A.
biwa@...
K6OQK
--
Burt I. Weiner Associates
Broadcast Technical Services
Glendale, CA U.S.A.
K6OQK
Burt I. Weiner Associates
Broadcast Technical Services
Glendale, California U.S.A.
biwa@...
K6OQK
--
Burt I. Weiner Associates
Broadcast Technical Services
Glendale, CA? U.S.A.
K6OQK
Burt K6OQK