On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 04:16 AM, Kurt Poulsen wrote:
Hi Kurt,
Thanks for the reply.
My humble opinion is like your indications that L and C coefficient are not
relevant for the calibration kit delivered with the NanoVNA and in particular
as we have no idea if the kit are the same for all deliveries.
Agreed.
Until there is a full blown calibration kit definition embedded in the NanoVNA
this is the way forward to use the NanoVNA-saver.
Agreed.
again my opinion is that would be an overkill for the majority of NanoVNA
users. It is far better to focus on how and with simple means to find the
needed delays for a homemade kit or e.g. a BNC kit bought from SDR kits where
all these data are supplied with the kit.
Agreed. Describing how to characterize a homemade BNC kit would be a great idea.
I did measure the
supplied kit based on calibration by my HP 3.5mm kit on another VNA and I will
repeat and publish the result for those values to be entered in NanoVNA saver.
Kurt, that would be excellent! I'm looking forward to seeing these values
Best regards,
Jeff, k6jca
