Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Re: NanoVNA-Saver 0.0.12
Hi Bo,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
now I've gotten to your long list of ideas! Thanks for providing them! Screenshot/image saving is definitely interesting! Currently, the graphs/plots are all painted directly on a Qt widget, so I would have to find something that could save those. I think it should be possible, though. Exporting a general frequency/amplitude (or even amplitude/frequency) file shouldn't be much of an issue. But, maybe it relates to your next suggestion: The auto markers for filters. I'd *love* to do that! My biggest issue is finding a way to 1) identify the filter, 2) find out what the passband is, and what the passband level/ripple is, and then identify the 3dB/10dB etc. points. The latter part, finding the points, is "easy". What worries me is the first part :-) The marker architecture is fully set up to allow for more than 3 markers - but to fit in 1366x768, it's currently limited to 3. I think I'll add it as a setting so you can have more. :-) Thicker trace lines should be an easy setting to make. The cosmetic points are all sensible, and I'll endeavour to have them included soon! The only exception is the COM port bit: The current functionality already finds the correct device if possible, so a dropdown menu would only really be required if you have more than 1 NanoVNA connected... I don't think I'll present the users with devices that the software can't identify as compatible, for now at least, but maybe the connection functionality needs an overhaul at some point. Segments: This was previously called sweep count, and is really the base functionality of the software, the sole reason I wrote it: It refers to how many segments the sweep span is broken into, each of 101 sample points, in order to increase resolution over the default the NanoVNA provides. So putting in 10 provides 1010 points, 50 gives 5050 points, etc. The label next to it presents the distance between each data point, as that's proven useful for me, at least. Hz/step is my term for the number of Hz between two data points .. maybe that's just my own terminology bleeding through, I don't know. I'm open to suggestions :-) Thanks again for taking the time to write out all these suggestions! -- Rune / 5Q5R On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 18:47, Bo, OZ2M <groups.io@...> wrote:
Hi |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss