开云体育

19 : "true value" - also : @Dr. David Kirkby :
/g/nanovna-users/message/3207

Hello,

We both thank you very much for the time you spent
to compose such a lengthy reply, by which you definitely
assured us that you are really interested on this subject,
which is so central to the reliable operation of any such
device - either [VNA] or [nanoVNA] !

Well, regarding the matters of a subjective character,
we don't like to repeat ourselves, so allow us, please,
to refer you to our personal replies to other honorable
members of this forum - although, if you are in hurry,
but you are still interested enough, then allow us,
please, to suggest you to search this topic for those
two 2 appearances of [personal taste], as well as,
that one 1 of [expediencies], to which we would like
to add here one more : allow us, please, to take care
of the contents, of our contributions to this very topic,
by ourselves alone.

But, regarding the matters of objective character,
allow us, please, to notice that if someone didn't
pay the owed attention to the subject matter of the
"true value", then he may be sure that he shall
definitely loose the thread of thoughts which
drives to the essence of the Estimation of the
Core of Measurement Uncertainty in VNA/nanoVNA,
that is, for example, when he insists to force his mind
to be trapped by the conventional triplet of the
"standards" (S,L,O), instead of the most general
one of "loads" (A,B,C)
-
he has been warned.

Sincerely,

yin&pez@arg

19