Actually I believe that I did measure with bandwith 1k, or at least I measured with whatever was the default for the FW as I used "clearconfig" when switching between FWs.
For some reason NanoVNASaver (0.3.8) seems to change the bandwidth so that is why it is shown that way in the screenshots.
I did check the screen on the NanoVNA before connecting with NanoVNASaver to store the screenshot and the screenshot did not change much from before connecting with NanoVNASaver.
I was wondering about the bandwidth and also the power settings, actually the reason I did take two screenshots for the hugen 1.0.45 FW was to verify that I had 1k bandwidth before connecting with NanoVNASaver.
I can perform any tests again if needed.
DiSlord, I will test the 1.0.45, and 1.0.48 from your GIT repo and make sure to select 1k bandwidth and power to 8mA and see what results I get.
Also, I want to be clear on the point that I don't know if the results I got is worse than the ones on the older firmware, I have just noticed that they look quite different.
At first I actually thought I had a contact issue as the traces looked so different from the older firmwares so that is why I started to look into this.
