¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Place to buy


 

One quick follow up note: The absolute levels out of the NanoVNA are 30 dB higher than those displayed. I always use a big, 2 watt, 30 dB attenuator as a ¡°condom¡± on the input to my spectrum analyzer to prevent and compensate for my own carelessness and stupidity should I put a signal with too high a level into it. Just add 30 dB to the displayed levels and it will be accurate.

WA8TOD

On Aug 26, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Warren Allgyer via Groups.Io <allgyer@...> wrote:

Jerry

My scope will not do 600 MHz but my spectrum analyzer will.

Here is a trace of the S11 output showing two, 100 MHz sweeps centered on: Yellow = 300 MHz and Purple = 600 MHz.

The Yellow 250 - 350 MHz sweep starts at Marker 1 and sweeps to Marker 3 on the fundamental. It then, at 300 MHz, jumps back to Marker 2 at 100 mHz and continues to 133.333333 MHz to produce the output from Marker 3 to 350 MHz. Note the discontinuity at 300 MHz (Marker 3) where the switch is made to using the harmonic and the level is boosted (Marker 2 level versus Marker 1).

The purple sweep spans 550 to 650 MHz and all is generated as the third harmonic of the fundamental from 183.333333 - 216.666667 MHz (Sorry¡­. ran out of markers). Note that the resulting 550 - 650 MHz sweep has no discontinuity. This is because there is no level or harmonic transition taking place at 600 MHz.

The clean sweep at 600 MHz versus the ¡°steppy¡± sweep at 300 MHz is what leads me to conclude that the 600 MHz ¡°spike¡± is simply a harmonic of the 300 MHz transition. As I write this I am thinking that would be easy to prove by sweeping any range that includes 600 MHz but excludes 300 MHz. I am betting there is no spike at 600 when sweeping say, 450 - 750 MHz. I have not checked that because I am not in the lab at the moment.

In any event I would continue to maintain the ¡°spikes¡± are immaterial to the operation of the instrument.

WA8TOD

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.