Thanks Marco.? Great insight,
Dr. Dan S. Gilliam, Sr.Ham Call: K5KHZDMR ID: 1151012k5khz@yahoo434-210-8380434-210-8383 Cell
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Monday, May 11, 2020, 02:12:23 PM EDT, M Garza <mgarza896@...> wrote:
Hi Dan.
This is just my opinion.
I like the nanovna because I can give it a frequency range and see where
the antenna is resonant at, instantly.? With the MFJ-2XX, i had to tune
around to find that info.? I feel like I get a better picture as to what is
happening.? I also feel like the nanovna provides more functionality.
I have owned the MFJ-259x & the 269x.? They are great, IMO, but I also like
that the nanovna is cheaper & has a higher frequency that it can be used
for.
If I break the nanovna, it doesn't hurt as much & I can get the latest
model (actually, probably 3 nanovnas to 1 MFJ).
Marco - KG5PRT.
On Mon, May 11, 2020, 12:47 PM Dan Gilliam via groups.io <k5khz=
[email protected]> wrote:
I am preparing to purchase my first antenna analyzer product.? I have an
old MFJ-209 which has neither meters nor frequency readout.? I love to
build antennas, especially for my ham club.
Can any of you give a reason pro or con as to why nanovna vs MfJ 259
series.? I presume many are nanovna users due to the lower cost.? Is there
any tradeoff that would discourage either?
Thanks in advance from a new subscriber to [email protected]
Dan? K5KHZ
