开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Re: Looking for a good cheap antenna analyser
There are lots of fakes and poor performing clones out there, I bought mine directly from the approved Zeenko store on AliExpress. But other dealers include Mirfield Electronics in the UK, but not
By Martin - Southwest UK · #20391 ·
Re: Looking for a good cheap antenna analyser
Simon, I understand there are lots of cheaper copies of NanoVNAs which are not genuine and inferior mechanically and technically. Perhaps others here can advise the best sources, but you have to be
By JohnG3PQA · #20390 ·
Re: Null Depth versus Torsion
I dont believe that faradays law (which can be used to explain the voltage induced in a small constant current loop) distinguishes between a horizontal and a vertical part of the loop conductor.
Re: Wellbrook 50 ohm preamp to Files
Steve, Yes, I'd like to do this comparison when I have time. Finally a reason to use 2SC5551's that you sent me a while ago :) Martin, This preamp is a 50 Ohm in/out Norton push-pull, the only
By vbifyz · #20388 ·
Re: Wellbrook 50 ohm preamp to Files
It looks similar to the Wellbrook loop amplifier itself, but I think some time ago, it was decided that this wasn't actually a Norton Amplifier, but it embodied another form of
By Martin - Southwest UK · #20387 ·
Re: Null Depth versus Torsion
Ah, that's where I'm totally out of my depth, JohnT. (I meant the vector cross product of H with any horizontal conductor.) Just don't understand how a horizontally varying H vector can induce any
By Paul White · #20386 ·
Re: Wellbrook 50 ohm preamp to Files
Mike, Since you told us you have an IMD test set, maybe you should build the two types and measure them, using same transistors and same current, and let us know the results.??? :) Steve
By Steve Ratzlaff · #20385 ·
Re: Wellbrook 50 ohm preamp to Files
I wonder how this 2-transformer circuit compares to Lankford 4-transformer design in terms of IMD. I would expect even better OIP2, because of the symmetry of the output transformer 73, Mike AF7KR
By vbifyz · #20384 ·
Re: Looking for a good cheap antenna analyser
Hi Simon, I think it depends upon what you are most likely to use it for, and how careful (or careless) you tend to be with kit. Most of my applications are indoors, but I have used it up a tower
By Martin - Southwest UK · #20383 ·
Re: Looking for a good cheap antenna analyser
Hi All Thanks for inputs.. As it happens..( abit of back ground info here first. I am electrical and electronic engineer on 3 ferries very near Plymouth, also have a very good mechanical
By Simon · #20382 ·
Wellbrook 50 ohm preamp to Files
Andrew Ikin of Wellbrook for a short time offered a version of the ALA1530LN with an additional 9 dB gain Norton preamp in the receiver coupler--this version was called the ALA1530LNP. He developed
By Steve Ratzlaff · #20381 ·
Re: MLA-30+, the story continues! #Small_receiving_loops_RX-only
I have that, too. The numbers achieved with that setup were slightly worse, especially F1+F2 OIP2 (+90dBm). To be honest, I didn't buffer the oscillators that well, the max levels at the DUT input are
By vbifyz · #20380 ·
Re: Null Depth versus Torsion
Paul, I'm not clear as to the meaning of your term "... H cross horizontal is still zero", please explain. However, since a loop that is electrically-balanced to ground does not produce a response
By JohnT · #20379 ·
Re: Looking for a good cheap antenna analyser
The terminology and menu structure of the NANOs emulates the VNAs offered by the"big boys" . I've used these for decades and find the NANOs very easy and quite friendly to use. Consequently, the
By W0LEV · #20378 ·
Re: Looking for a good cheap antenna analyser
Hi John, I agreed, we all have own personal favourites for various reasons, a lot depends upon our pattern of use. Personally, I tend to find that I'm using my LiteVNA 64 and TinySA Ultra for more
By Martin - Southwest UK · #20377 ·
Re: Looking for a good cheap antenna analyser
Martin, All agreed and very true, but Simon was enquiring about an inexpensive antenna analyser rather than test bench device using NanoVNA Saver software etc.. The now obsolete devices have various
By JohnG3PQA · #20376 ·
Re: MLA-30+, the story continues! #Small_receiving_loops_RX-only
Would it be not less effort to use two well buffered X-tal Oscillators instead of an Si5351 followed by two x-tal filters? I do it this way with a RF-2-tone generator proposed by DC4KU and are able to
Re: Null Depth versus Torsion
Good morning and thanks, JohnT :) Would it be right to understand the source of that imbalance would be from the E component, as H cross horizontal is still zero? @Martin, day-dreaming eats up too
By Paul White · #20374 ·
Re: Null Depth versus Torsion
Hi John, That is assuming you are in the correct plane WRT the incident wave, and you will also have a reduction in the amplitude component, which I speculate will be -3dB when the offset is at 45
By Martin - Southwest UK · #20373 ·
Re: Null Depth versus Torsion
Good evening Paul, Seems to me that if you were to "tilt" your square loop such that the upper horizontal leg were closer to the signal source and the lower leg were further away from the source, a
By JohnT · #20372 ·