¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Locked Re: (Slightly) off topic
Thanks Bob, Steve and John for your suggestions. A couple of days ago I received a message "Your Groups.i.o Account is Bouncing" and email delivery to my account has been suspended.? The problem is
By Chris van Lint · #16835 ·
Locked Re: Interesting loop design
It seems that the inline images in my last message did not come through, so I uploaded them to the files section as described below. Far field cardioid
By qrp.gaijin · #16834 ·
Locked Re: Interesting loop design
Good questions. The precise nature of your inquiry suggests to me that perhaps you have tried yourself to investigate this phenomenon in NEC, and perhaps you have encountered the same challenges that
By qrp.gaijin · #16833 ·
Locked Re: Interesting loop design
How did you get it? Where did you put the source on the outer loop? Could you provide nec file for it?
By Piotr, SP2BPD · #16832 ·
Locked Re: (Slightly) off topic
Did you publish this on your Earthlink webpage? If so, I know someone who probably saved it because he was impressed with all of your designs. Do you recall the name?
By Jeff Green <Jeff.L.Green1970@...> · #16831 ·
Locked Re: (Slightly) off topic
Chris:My old web site has the schematic for a simple unity gain multicoupler (splitter). It's very broadband and actually has about 1 dB of gain with 50 Ohm ports. I tried to keep it simple to avoid
By Bob, N1KPR · #16830 ·
Locked Re: (Slightly) off topic
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=PSC-4-1W%2B I use these Minicircuits devices with amplification for distribution of my RX system. John TA4/G4IJD ?l¨¹den?z beach
By John · #16829 ·
Locked Re: (Slightly) off topic
Hi Chris G4AON published a 4 port active distribution amplifier recently. There is a link on his QSL web page https://www.qsl.net/g4aon/ Regards Stephen, G4VBD
By Steve, G4VBD · #16828 ·
Locked (Slightly) off topic
Hi all, Decades ago I built a 4 port antenna splitter for the 10 - 30MHz range.? It is working quite well, but I find myself in a position where I need an additional one.? In the meantime I have
By Chris van Lint · #16827 ·
Locked Re: Interesting loop design
The CTL was one of several easy to make devices promoted by Villard as an external paid " Consultant" to the Voice of America to increase their audience numbers. So that's why these constructional
By Alan · #16826 ·
Locked Re: Interesting loop design
After thinking about the results of some old 4nec2 simulations, I think I have finally figured it out. The outer, larger-diameter high-impedance loop is resonant and is resistively loaded. As was
By qrp.gaijin · #16825 ·
Locked Re: Interesting loop design
At a quick first glance I think it is operating pretty much as a standard cardioid loop. The Low Z loop works as a standard H field 'magnetic' loop, and the second larger diameter Hi Z loop is more
By Martin - Southwest UK · #16824 ·
Locked Re: Interesting loop design
I'm late to this discussion, but would like to add a comment about another unidirectional small loop antenna design. I think the same, or perhaps a similar, principle is used by the late Dr. Mike
By qrp.gaijin · #16823 ·
Locked LZ1AQ Loop Amp
If any one is interested I one LZ1AQ loop amp for sale and I have several boards for sale that will include the 2SC5551 transistors. ?You can contact me off list at everettsharp (at) aol com?Everett
By Everett N4CY · #16822 ·
Locked Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Steve, I apologize for giving an incorrect description of this group to the OP. I stand corrected! Thank you. 73, Joe K9LY
By r388yh · #16821 ·
Locked Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Should be *1786* covers 10-30 Mhz and the 1788 covers 7 Mhz to 21Mhz I don't want to be forced to pay a guy to fix my loop antenna more than he is worth.
By gfmucci · #16820 ·
Locked Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
The 1788 covers 10-30 Mhz and the 1788 covers 7 Mhz to 21Mhz John VE3IPS Double check all solder joints as the QC can be? poor at MFJ Can you believe the minimum wage in Mississippi is $7.25 an
By John · #16819 ·
Locked Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Hi Yes mag loop group is all about trx loops, HOWEVER the knowledge on here is supreme.. I see no issues with posts about mfj or whatever here.. Think about it..no one with real estate in middle of
By Simon · #16818 ·
Locked Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Agree, but I was responding to the list owner's posting on this thread.? Gets complicated. Dexter
By Dexter · #16817 ·
Locked Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Being the OP of this thread, I was subsequently reminded that for "transmitting loops" I should have posted my question on the "Mag Loop" Group forum instead of to this Group.? However, my reference
By gfmucci · #16816 ·