Locked
Re: (Slightly) off topic
Thanks Bob, Steve and John for your suggestions.
A couple of days ago I received a message "Your Groups.i.o Account is Bouncing" and email delivery to my account has been suspended.? The problem is
By
Chris van Lint
·
#16835
·
|
Locked
Re: Interesting loop design
It seems that the inline images in my last message did not come through, so I uploaded them to the files section as described below.
Far field cardioid
By
qrp.gaijin
·
#16834
·
|
Locked
Re: Interesting loop design
Good questions. The precise nature of your inquiry suggests to me that perhaps you have tried yourself to investigate this phenomenon in NEC, and perhaps you have encountered the same challenges that
By
qrp.gaijin
·
#16833
·
|
Locked
Re: Interesting loop design
How did you get it? Where did you put the source on the outer loop? Could you provide nec file for it?
By
Piotr, SP2BPD
·
#16832
·
|
Locked
Re: (Slightly) off topic
Did you publish this on your Earthlink webpage?
If so, I know someone who probably saved it because he was impressed with all of your designs.
Do you recall the name?
By
Jeff Green <Jeff.L.Green1970@...>
·
#16831
·
|
Locked
Re: (Slightly) off topic
Chris:My old web site has the schematic for a simple unity gain multicoupler (splitter).
It's very broadband and actually has about 1 dB of gain with 50 Ohm ports.
I tried to keep it simple to avoid
By
Bob, N1KPR
·
#16830
·
|
Locked
Re: (Slightly) off topic
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=PSC-4-1W%2B
I use these Minicircuits devices with amplification for distribution of my RX system.
John TA4/G4IJD ?l¨¹den?z beach
By
John
·
#16829
·
|
Locked
Re: (Slightly) off topic
Hi Chris
G4AON published a 4 port active distribution amplifier recently.
There is a link on his QSL web page
https://www.qsl.net/g4aon/
Regards
Stephen, G4VBD
By
Steve, G4VBD
·
#16828
·
|
Locked
(Slightly) off topic
Hi all,
Decades ago I built a 4 port antenna splitter for the 10 - 30MHz range.? It is working quite well, but I find myself in a position where I need an additional one.? In the meantime I have
By
Chris van Lint
·
#16827
·
|
Locked
Re: Interesting loop design
The CTL was one of several easy to make devices promoted by Villard as an external paid " Consultant" to the Voice of America to increase their audience numbers. So that's why these constructional
By
Alan
·
#16826
·
|
Locked
Re: Interesting loop design
After thinking about the results of some old 4nec2 simulations, I think I have finally figured it out.
The outer, larger-diameter high-impedance loop is resonant and is resistively loaded. As was
By
qrp.gaijin
·
#16825
·
|
Locked
Re: Interesting loop design
At a quick first glance I think it is operating pretty much as a standard cardioid loop.
The Low Z loop works as a standard H field 'magnetic' loop, and the second larger diameter Hi Z loop is more
By
Martin - Southwest UK
·
#16824
·
|
Locked
Re: Interesting loop design
I'm late to this discussion, but would like to add a comment about another unidirectional small loop antenna design.
I think the same, or perhaps a similar, principle is used by the late Dr. Mike
By
qrp.gaijin
·
#16823
·
|
Locked
LZ1AQ Loop Amp
If any one is interested I one LZ1AQ loop amp for sale and I have several boards for sale that will include the 2SC5551 transistors.
?You can contact me off list at everettsharp (at) aol com?Everett
By
Everett N4CY
·
#16822
·
|
Locked
Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Steve, I apologize for giving an incorrect description of this group to the OP. I stand corrected! Thank you.
73, Joe K9LY
By
r388yh
·
#16821
·
|
Locked
Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Should be *1786* covers 10-30 Mhz and the 1788 covers 7 Mhz to 21Mhz
I don't want to be forced to pay a guy to fix my loop antenna more than he is worth.
By
gfmucci
·
#16820
·
|
Locked
Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
The 1788 covers 10-30 Mhz and the 1788 covers 7 Mhz to 21Mhz
John VE3IPS
Double check all solder joints as the QC can be? poor at MFJ
Can you believe the minimum wage in Mississippi is $7.25 an
By
John
·
#16819
·
|
Locked
Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Hi
Yes mag loop group is all about trx loops, HOWEVER the knowledge on here is supreme.. I see no issues with posts about mfj or whatever here..
Think about it..no one with real estate in middle of
By
Simon
·
#16818
·
|
Locked
Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Agree, but I was responding to the list owner's posting on this thread.? Gets complicated.
Dexter
By
Dexter
·
#16817
·
|
Locked
Re: MFJ-1786 versus MFJ-1788
Being the OP of this thread, I was subsequently reminded that for "transmitting loops" I should have posted my question on the "Mag Loop" Group forum instead of to this Group.? However, my reference
By
gfmucci
·
#16816
·
|