¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Locked FW: FW: [loopantennas] Optimizing Small Untuned Loop Antennas


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Correction in wording ¨C instead of number of loops read ?number of turns¡­

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Raphael Wasserman via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 1:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: [loopantennas] Optimizing Small Untuned Loop Antennas

?

Martin,

?

Regardless the type of loop antenna untuned or tuned the radiation resistance gets calculated ?the same way because the radiation resistance is:

??? R rad.= 31200 x (NxA / wavelength of interest^2) ^2 where N ¨C number of loops, A=pi x ( D/2)^2 ,where D is diameter of loop.

Only the deference between an untuned and tuned loop antennas will be their impedances due to Q-factor of antenna at resonant frequency.

?

Regards,

?

Raphael

?

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Martin via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 12:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: [loopantennas] Optimizing Small Untuned Loop Antennas

?

On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 10:51 PM, Raphael Wasserman wrote:

Probably now you may understand the meaning of receiving antenna efficiency factor.

Unfortunately, I'm now even more confused...

But it think this is simply due to the definitions and how they are being used.

A quick question.

If we have a 'broadband' un-tuned loop, and then tune it to resonance, does this change the Radiation Resistance ?

Regards,

Martin

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.