¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Locked Re: Pixel-RF-PRO-1B receive magnetic Loop


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Chris Trask wrote on Feb 4.
?
?
"In my design (in the group files section) I chose a 12V supply rail as it was best suited for direct operation from 12V batteries, such as Gel Cells, which would take care of any concerns of power supply induced noise. The biasing of the two stages was selected to give a decent power consumption vs. performance. At HF frequencies the NF performance is secondary to IMD performance due to terrestrial and galactic background noise and the presence of numerous high-power broadcast stations.

The performance of my amplifier exceeds that of Pixel and Wellbrook, having a 2.42dB NF at 10MHz. To get better IMD performance than I attained would require a 2W or more power amplifier, which would at least double the power consumption. Using an older transistor such as the 2N3553 or a newer device such as the NE46134 in the output stage and boosting the biasing current to 100mA or so would do it.


Chris"
?
?
Hello Chris,
?
Running? Pixel loops from a Wellbrook ALA1530 Antenna Interface with a 12V dc supply makes little difference unless you are measuring the IOP3 which only changes by a few dBm.
?
Concerning your last paragragh which you have repeated many times. I am not aware that any one else in the group has been able to get your design working. The NF of Pixel and Wellbrook loops is in the region of 2dB; so I don't see an issue here. Wellbrooks ALA1530S+ Imperium has a much more impressive IOP3 of +55dBm.
?
?
73
?
Andrew

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.