¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: RU-1:1 UnUn


 

I guess it strikes me odd that you would consider the characteristics to be of "Shoddy Manufacturing.
?A 2.25 SWR High is not out of line with the Physics involved, as a matter of fact, as a compromise design, it's pretty darn good!

I guess it may come down to expectations; what did you expect this UNUN to do for your antenna?

Dave WA4WX

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:54?AM <rainer@...> wrote:

Lawrence,

What ¡°other thread¡± did you post this and got an answer? I see the same behavior and would like to see the response to this.

?

Thanks

Rainer

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Lawrence KC6WOG
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 2:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ldgelectronics] RU-1:1 UnUn

?

Ryan, in another thread, I posted my SWR sweeps of the RU-1:1 into a dummy load, and now understand why it's behaving strangely with my portable rigs. I believe I'll try rewinding it in the manner you suggest in your video. I assume that's what Vince did with good results. I'm a big fan of LDG and greatly enjoy their tuners, but this is a rather shoddy product! I do like the size and form factor, hopefully rewinding it will do the trick.

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.