Re: Now: Enhancement request to enforce 30m/60m power limits Was Re: NOT MANY POSTS
|
To be clear, we do follow the power limits on the 60-M channels. However, on occasion (not often) ?MARS has permission to exceed the power limits for certain Exercises. In addition , we have several frequencies on that band in MARS that are not part of the designated 60-meter frequencies. ? SB N7QDZ ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of tuneupmagic (null) via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 3:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [la1k] Now: Enhancement request to enforce 30m/60m power limits Was Re: NOT MANY POSTS? On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:23 AM, David Smith wrote: I'll pass bugging those guys.? I do appreciate Mark, he's a great guy, he's intercepted many grouchy responses from Paul and turned them into positive outcomes.
David, AF6HO,
Just to recap, in your post /g/la1k/message/1513 you stated "Don't take this the wrong way Ray, but given the response is you shouldn't be using the LA-1K at all on those bands due to legal limits - 100W on 60m and 200W on 30m - I don't see any value of your request asking them to resolve it." and then you chose not to bug those guys, as I'd suggested in my post /g/la1k/message/1515, to learn why Mr. Mark Ward (Palstar's technician) thought my request's a valid one.
And now we have, Stephan's, N7QDZ, post /g/la1k/message/1516 pointing out in part, "It would be very helpful to have a 60-meter selection on the amp."? So, David, AF6HO, I hope you will eventually truly understand the value of my request as seen in my 7-Jun-2023 post /g/la1k/message/1316.
73
Ray
KJ5MI
|
