On 15/04/2024 13:12, Andy wrote:
Kicad alway snaps
to grid in pcbnew you just set the grid size option in the menu
Be aware that some footprints a not based on imperial 0.1 grid nut
use metric, the newer and components are often in a metric grid
spacing
I think the OP is wanting this in the schematic editor.
--
Regards,
Tony
|
Kicad alway snaps to grid in pcbnew you just set the grid size option in the menu
Be aware that some footprints a not based on imperial 0.1 grid nut use metric, the newer and components are often in a metric grid spacing
Andy
|
On 15/04/2024 12:58, John Woodgate wrote:
I have
now laid out my board but I want to make it using 0.1 inch
perfboard, so I would like to have all parts on the 0.1 inch grid,
but I don't see anywhere a 'snap to grid' option in PCB Editor. It
is in Schematic editor, where I would have thought that it is less
important. The word 'snap' doesn't appear in the documents. Please
advise.
- Right-click > Grid...
- Right-click > Select All (Ctrl-A)
- Right-click > Align Items to Grid
(This is in Version 8.)
--
Regards,
Tony
|
I have now laid out my board but I want to
make it using 0.1 inch perfboard, so I would like to have all
parts on the 0.1 inch grid, but I don't see anywhere a 'snap to
grid' option in PCB Editor. It is in Schematic editor, where I
would have thought that it is less important. The word 'snap'
doesn't appear in the documents. Please advise.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
Re: Components have specified ends
Ki cad has lots of command options, many of these care accessable when yob right click the mouse while an object is selected?
Usually just hovering the mouse pointer over the object is enough to select it.??
Andy
|
Re: Components have specified ends
Thanks, but I don't understand 'right !lick'.
If it is 'right click', I still don't know what to click on.
On 2024-04-13 21:35, Andy wrote:
Another thing to note. Remember to check the right !lick context
menu you should find all sorts of footprint movement options
there.
Andy
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
Re: Components have specified ends
Another thing to note. Remember to check the right !lick context menu you should find all sorts of footprint movement options there.
Andy
|
Re: Components have specified ends
This is exactly the behavior you want. (Think about electrolytic caps)
Put he mouse pointer over the component then press R a couple of times to rotate the footprint.
That should untangle the rats nest.
Andy
|
Re: Components have specified ends
Hi
Back in the day, when I was a Kicad rookie, I found this quite
natural.
Pins are numbered in schematic symbols and also in PCB
footprints, and naturally the symbols and footprints numbers must
match.
Its just the symmetric non polarized components that can get you
in this situation. But those cases are only a handful of
components; the vast majority of electronics components have
strict connection rules.
You can familiarize yourself with this and other details if you
invest some time just browsing a few components with the symbol
and footprint editors. You will also get a feeling for how ERC
rules work.
Best regards
Jorge
On 13/04/24 19:04, John Woodgate wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks. I can't try it now, but I expect it
will work. I guess it's needed for the schematic to work in
simulation. But It's something that I would expect to be
mentioned in 'Getting Started', because it's really quite
fundamental to laying out a PCB.
On 2024-04-13 18:58, Jorge Ferreira
wrote:
Hi
Yes.
Also when I come across this issue when routing a PCB, I go back
to the schematic and rotate the component there.
regards
Jorge
On 13/04/24 18:54, CW via groups.io wrote:
Are you trying to place a copper track
from the end of one capacitor to
another and KiCad won't let you make that connection?
KiCad will only allow you to make connections between
components that
are described in the schematic you have entered. So if your
schematic
says the connections have to be made one way, and you try and
do it
another way, it won't let you.
You can turn on the Ratsnest function in the PCB editor which
will show
you the connections KiCad wants to make between components,
driven by
what you put in the schematic. That should help you see what
is going on.
On 4/13/2024 10:47 AM, John Woodgate wrote:
I am having a? problem with laying out
a simple PCB, using version 8.01
under Widows 11. The problem is that even resistors and
capacitors have
specified ends, and it seems impossible to overcome this.
For example, I
have two capacitors to be connected in parallel to make up a
non-standard value. KiCad insists on connecting the north
end of C1 to
the south end of C2, so the other connection C1S to C2N
cannot be made.
I see that it's not possible to directly invert a footprint,
and
applying? a 90 degree turn twice doesn't fix the problem.
I can't find anything about this in 'Getting Started' or the
'English
Documentation', but of course it might be in there
somewhere. Please advise.
--?
Signature OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Keep trying
???
Virus-free.www.avg.com
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
Re: Components have specified ends
just turning twice always works. Try again, you must have made a
mistake.
Reinier
Op 13-4-2024 om 19:47 schreef John
Woodgate:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I am having a? problem with laying out a
simple PCB, using version 8.01 under Widows 11. The problem is
that even resistors and capacitors have specified ends, and it
seems impossible to overcome this. For example, I have two
capacitors to be connected in parallel to make up a
non-standard value. KiCad insists on connecting the north end
of C1 to the south end of C2, so the other connection C1S to
C2N cannot be made. I see that it's not possible to directly
invert a footprint, and applying? a 90 degree turn twice
doesn't fix the problem.?
I can't find anything about this in 'Getting
Started' or the 'English Documentation', but of course it
might be in there somewhere. Please advise.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
Re: Components have specified ends
Thanks. I can't try it now, but I expect it
will work. I guess it's needed for the schematic to work in
simulation. But It's something that I would expect to be
mentioned in 'Getting Started', because it's really quite
fundamental to laying out a PCB.
On 2024-04-13 18:58, Jorge Ferreira
wrote:
Hi
Yes.
Also when I come across this issue when routing a PCB, I go back
to the schematic and rotate the component there.
regards
Jorge
On 13/04/24 18:54, CW via groups.io wrote:
Are you trying to place a copper track
from the end of one capacitor to
another and KiCad won't let you make that connection?
KiCad will only allow you to make connections between components
that
are described in the schematic you have entered. So if your
schematic
says the connections have to be made one way, and you try and do
it
another way, it won't let you.
You can turn on the Ratsnest function in the PCB editor which
will show
you the connections KiCad wants to make between components,
driven by
what you put in the schematic. That should help you see what is
going on.
On 4/13/2024 10:47 AM, John Woodgate wrote:
I am having a? problem with laying out a
simple PCB, using version 8.01
under Widows 11. The problem is that even resistors and
capacitors have
specified ends, and it seems impossible to overcome this. For
example, I
have two capacitors to be connected in parallel to make up a
non-standard value. KiCad insists on connecting the north end
of C1 to
the south end of C2, so the other connection C1S to C2N cannot
be made.
I see that it's not possible to directly invert a footprint,
and
applying? a 90 degree turn twice doesn't fix the problem.
I can't find anything about this in 'Getting Started' or the
'English
Documentation', but of course it might be in there somewhere.
Please advise.
--?
Signature OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Keep trying
???
Virus-free.www.avg.com
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
Re: Components have specified ends
Hi
Yes.
Also when I come across this issue when routing a PCB, I go back to the schematic and rotate the component there.
regards
Jorge
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 13/04/24 18:54, CW via groups.io wrote: Are you trying to place a copper track from the end of one capacitor to
another and KiCad won't let you make that connection?
KiCad will only allow you to make connections between components that
are described in the schematic you have entered. So if your schematic
says the connections have to be made one way, and you try and do it
another way, it won't let you.
You can turn on the Ratsnest function in the PCB editor which will show
you the connections KiCad wants to make between components, driven by
what you put in the schematic. That should help you see what is going on.
On 4/13/2024 10:47 AM, John Woodgate wrote:
I am having a? problem with laying out a simple PCB, using version 8.01
under Widows 11. The problem is that even resistors and capacitors have
specified ends, and it seems impossible to overcome this. For example, I
have two capacitors to be connected in parallel to make up a
non-standard value. KiCad insists on connecting the north end of C1 to
the south end of C2, so the other connection C1S to C2N cannot be made.
I see that it's not possible to directly invert a footprint, and
applying? a 90 degree turn twice doesn't fix the problem.
I can't find anything about this in 'Getting Started' or the 'English
Documentation', but of course it might be in there somewhere. Please advise.
--
Signature OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Keep trying
<> Virus-free.www.avg.com <>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
|
Re: Components have specified ends
Are you trying to place a copper track from the end of one capacitor to
another and KiCad won't let you make that connection?
KiCad will only allow you to make connections between components that
are described in the schematic you have entered. So if your schematic
says the connections have to be made one way, and you try and do it
another way, it won't let you.
You can turn on the Ratsnest function in the PCB editor which will show
you the connections KiCad wants to make between components, driven by
what you put in the schematic. That should help you see what is going on.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 4/13/2024 10:47 AM, John Woodgate wrote: I am having a? problem with laying out a simple PCB, using version 8.01
under Widows 11. The problem is that even resistors and capacitors have
specified ends, and it seems impossible to overcome this. For example, I
have two capacitors to be connected in parallel to make up a
non-standard value. KiCad insists on connecting the north end of C1 to
the south end of C2, so the other connection C1S to C2N cannot be made.
I see that it's not possible to directly invert a footprint, and
applying? a 90 degree turn twice doesn't fix the problem.
I can't find anything about this in 'Getting Started' or the 'English
Documentation', but of course it might be in there somewhere. Please advise.
--
Signature OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Keep trying
<> Virus-free.www.avg.com <>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
|
Components have specified ends
I am having a? problem with laying out a
simple PCB, using version 8.01 under Widows 11. The problem is
that even resistors and capacitors have specified ends, and it
seems impossible to overcome this. For example, I have two
capacitors to be connected in parallel to make up a non-standard
value. KiCad insists on connecting the north end of C1 to the
south end of C2, so the other connection C1S to C2N cannot be
made. I see that it's not possible to directly invert a
footprint, and applying? a 90 degree turn twice doesn't fix the
problem.?
I can't find anything about this in 'Getting
Started' or the 'English Documentation', but of course it might
be in there somewhere. Please advise.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
See:
in particular, the subsection 'Power Symbols'.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 4/12/2024 8:51 AM, John Woodgate wrote: Thanks all for help.
On 2024-04-12 14:34, Reinier Gerritsen wrote:
Place one after the switch as well. You could also just ignore the
warning.
Reinier
Op 12-4-2024 om 15:31 schreef John Woodgate:
I have attached PWR_FLAG labels to my battery input terminals, but I
still get a 'not driven' violation on the positive rail after the
on-off switch, which is shown in the ON position. Is this normal, or
have I got a hidden error in the schematic?
--
Signature OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Keep trying
<> Virus-free.www.avg.com <>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
--
Signature OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Keep trying
|
Thanks all for help.
On 2024-04-12 14:34, Reinier Gerritsen
wrote:
Place one after the switch as well. You could also just ignore the
warning.
Reinier
Op 12-4-2024 om 15:31 schreef John
Woodgate:
I have attached PWR_FLAG labels to my
battery input terminals, but I still get a 'not driven'
violation on the positive rail after the on-off switch,
which is shown in the ON position. Is this normal, or have I
got a hidden error in the schematic?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh,
Essex UK
Keep trying
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
Place one after the switch as well. You could also just ignore the
warning.
Reinier
Op 12-4-2024 om 15:31 schreef John
Woodgate:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I have attached PWR_FLAG labels to my
battery input terminals, but I still get a 'not driven'
violation on the positive rail after the on-off switch, which
is shown in the ON position. Is this normal, or have I got a
hidden error in the schematic?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
Kicad doesn't know that switches have an "on" and and "off", so you have
to place the power flag downstream of the switch.
Regards,
Robert.
* Plain text email - safe, readable, inclusive. *
|
Hard to visualize what you are saying but the pin has to be defined
as power or passive I think.
On 2024-04-12 9:31 a.m., John Woodgate
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I have attached PWR_FLAG labels to my
battery input terminals, but I still get a 'not driven'
violation on the positive rail after the on-off switch, which
is shown in the ON position. Is this normal, or have I got a
hidden error in the schematic?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
I have attached PWR_FLAG labels to my battery
input terminals, but I still get a 'not driven' violation on the
positive rail after the on-off switch, which is shown in the ON
position. Is this normal, or have I got a hidden error in the
schematic?
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only
Best wishes
John Woodgate, Rayleigh, Essex
UK
Keep trying
|
Tony Casey
John Woodgate