Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Locked
Figuring out where I need to place my "blocks"
#blocks
Tim Kelley
Good morning,
I am in the planning stages of my layout. I am currently trying to figure out where I need to place my "blocks". I am using all Digitrax hardware including a Digitrax BXP88 for power management and also block occupancy detection. I believe the BXP88 reports block occupancy status to LocoNet. I'm also using Peco ElectroFrog turnouts. I've watched some videos on youtube and I'm thinking of setting up my Peco ElectroFrog turnouts so that each one of those turnouts is it's own individual block. I'm planning to use JMRI software for running my layout and someday maybe CATS software. Someday I plan on adding signals to my layout. I believe there are a couple of different ways of wiring up the Peco ElectroFrog turnouts. So should I plan on setting up my turnouts so that each one of them is it's own block? What do you guys think? Is that the best plan? Thanks, Tim |
Tim, Since you plan to do signaling, I would recommend each turnout, or group of turnouts, has its own block. ?For example, a "group of turnouts" could be two turnouts acting as a 3-way turnout. ?Or an interlocking plant. A signal protects a "point of conflict". ?That is normally a turnout or a level crossing. ?In JMRI, signal masts are placed at block boundaries. ?To fully protect a turnout, the block boundaries have to be at the throat and legs. It is easier to work with too many blocks than not enough blocks. Dave Sand ----- Original message ----- From: Tim Kelley <tim.kelley@...> Subject: [jmriusers] Figuring out where I need to place my "blocks" Date: Monday, May 01, 2023 11:05 AM Good morning, I am in the planning stages of my layout. I am currently trying to figure out where I need to place my "blocks". I am using all Digitrax hardware including a Digitrax BXP88 for power management and also block occupancy detection. I believe the BXP88 reports block occupancy status to LocoNet. I'm also using Peco ElectroFrog turnouts. I've watched some videos on youtube and I'm thinking of setting up my Peco ElectroFrog turnouts so that each one of those turnouts is it's own individual block. I'm planning to use JMRI software for running my layout and someday maybe CATS software. Someday I plan on adding signals to my layout. I believe there are a couple of different ways of wiring up the Peco ElectroFrog turnouts. So should I plan on setting up my turnouts so that each one of them is it's own block? What do you guys think? Is that the best plan? Thanks, Tim |
I found out right away that I couldn't think of individual items like blocks, signaling, detection, and power feed.
They are all part of a system. Start out with turnout protection.? Signals are needed (either real or virtual) on each leg. Signals reside (usually) at block boundaries. Some of my turnout track work are close and I consider that set of turnouts as one structure. (think 3-way) When you run automation, each turnout needs to be a block. If you plan to detect the turnout, gap each leg. I didn't burn a detector channel, so I simulated the turnout occupancy (it's tricky) Sometimes, I seriously thought of detecting certain turnouts. Generally, you'll assign a JMRI block to an electrical block and detect on the feed. I use JMRI mast logic, but plan your signals now regardless of signal system you use. For the time begin you and run automation without signals. I ran my automation with virtual signals until I installed hardware. Like carpentry - measure twice cut once - plan twice then build. -- Ken NYNH&H, Old Colony Division, Cape Cod Branch (1949-1959) [DB150][PR3][QuadLN_S][JMRI 5.3.5] |
开云体育Tim, Basically a signal is used to "protect" a "block" from being entered by reason of some conflict, usually either a conflicting route alignment or occupancy by another train. A "block" is a section of track that may be occupied by only a single train at a time. A piece of track such as a turnout, a yard ladder, a level
crossing, or even a length of single track, are all potential
blocks. For a portion of track that can legitimately hold more than one train at the same time you would normally treat that as multiple blocks. Some examples would be a single or double crossover. In some configurations it may only allow one train to occupy it, but in other configurations there may be two trains. Therefore it must be at least two blocks, one for each possible simultaneous path. On the other hand a slip switch can only be occupied by a single
train at a time, because even if it has the same track connections
as a crossover, you can not occupy more than one path at a time.
It is therefore only a single block. From the level crossing example it should be obvious that the
same block (the diamond) can be a part of two unrelated routes.
This means that signals on two different routes sometimes need to
be interlocked with one another. In this case of a diamond, only
one of its four possible paths may be cleared at a time. For automated running even multi-turnout yard leads might need to be detected, but a single block may be all that is required for a whole lead track, again because only one train at a time is allowed to occupy it. As you are planning for signal blocks you can mentally proceed
along each track and make note of possible points of conflict
where one train may need to wait on another. Those are where you
will add block junctions. (gaps) If you have long sections of
single track (typically longer than a train length) you may add a
block gap and intermediate signal to allow one train to follow
another. The prototype does this often, but normally our models
don't allow us this luxury very often, if at all. It is not
uncommon for a loco to be entering one town before the cab has
left the previous one. Dick :) On 5/1/2023 12:05 PM, Tim Kelley wrote:
Good morning, |
Tim Kelley
Thanks guys!
So it looks like each of my Peco ElectroFrog turnouts needs to be it's own block. I think what that means is regardless of whether the train is in the throat of the turnout or in any of it's 2 legs, that block must report as occupied. I think there are a couple of different ways to wire up a Peco Eletrcofrog turnout so I will revisit the youtube video (if I can find it again). Thanks, Tim |
Tim, Also bear in mind that it is very important that if the turnout reports as free, there must be no possibility of trains touching when attempting to pass. This has a huge bearing on where to actually cut the rails, and has mostly, but not exclusively, to do with the distance of the first non-isolating axle from the coupling closest to the turnout. Locos can easily be asymmetrical in this. Ideally, wagons/carriages/trailers will have resistive wheelsets, in which case the same applies at the tail end of the train. Without resistive wheelsets, automation is going to have to make assumptions (or be told about) train lengths at all times. Wouter On Mon, 1 May 2023 at 19:39, Tim Kelley <tim.kelley@...> wrote: Thanks guys! |
Tim Kelley
Thanks,?
Yes I know what resistive wheelsets are.? I'm planning to use them on my rolling stock (one for each car axle). I believe the resistive wheelsets draw current and that allows the Digitrax BXP88 to see that and mark that block as occupied. I have removed the "springs" that are in my Peco ElectrFrog turnouts. I'm planning to use Tortoise switch machines for controlling my Peco ElectrFrog turnouts. There is a single wire that drops down from the bottom of these Peco ElectroFrog turnouts. Is the purpose of that wire to "power the frog"? Can I use a Tam Valley depot frog juicer to power my frog? Thanks, Tim |
May I suggest one resistive axle per truck, and that one on the 'outside' or closest to its end of the car instead of every axle?? That wire you mention is to power the frog and can be powered by the TAM Valley Frog Juicer.? I've never had to remove the spring but then I use a different switch motor than you are planning on. Allison On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 4:37?PM Tim Kelley <tim.kelley@...> wrote: Thanks,? |
It's been half mentioned but just to reinforce it - if a short turnout is its own block, then you will need a LOT of resistor wheelsets at regular intervals, or as soon as the turnout block goes unoccupied, if your train hasn't cleared it, it could get derailed by a points move etc.
There are different types of block detectors, some detect on both rails, some just one. I'd definitely go for a detector that detects on one rail and stick it on the stock rail of a turnout as, with the kind of wiring you're suggesting for electrofrog, over half of the potentially already short turnout rail could be isolated from the rest, making 'full' block detection on both rails either tricky or prone to shorting the block detector. |
I agree that having resistors on several axles is OK, however one must ensure that the resistor wheel set does not cause other problems Just last week while cleaning wheels and checking their gauge on a train club car I noticed that one axle’s resistor was catching on a coupler box’s round head screw. (The resistor was a typical looking resistor with a wire coming out of both ends.) Moving the resistor’d axle to the other spot, or turning the truck around, solved the problem.
John H Harrington, DE |
Tim Kelley
Good morning, thanks for all the good advice!! I stumbled upon these web pages and they are very good in figuring out what modifications need to be made and how to make them ?to the Peco ElectroFrog turnouts and why. ????????????????dccwiki.com/PecoElectroFreog ????????????????wiringfordcc.com/switch_peco.htm Thanks, have a good day! Tim
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 08:45:59 AM CDT, John Huntzinger <jh66@...> wrote:
I agree that having resistors on several axles is OK, however one must ensure that the resistor wheel set does not cause other problems? Just last week while cleaning wheels and checking their gauge on a train club car I noticed that one axle’s resistor was catching on a coupler box’s round head screw. (The resistor was a typical looking resistor with a wire coming out of both ends.) Moving the resistor’d axle to the other spot, or turning the truck around, solved the problem. John H Harrington, DE |
开云体育I have one resistor per truck (47K) I use the inside axle, away from the coupler pocket for the reason that you describe. ?I like the surface mount resistors as they are very compact. ?I especially like how to do them on metal axles where they lay up on the insulator for the axle. ?The resistor is superglued in place and I use conductive paint to make the connection.Concern for not using the outside axles for coverage at turnouts or blocks is not a concern for me as I don’t run trains that close together and I don’t want to think that I’m creating operation scenarios that are that tight. ?No way to run a railroad. Apologies for not being strictly on JMRI discussion. Thomas Cain Indianapolis, IN atsf93@... See my layout and website at:??www.atsf93.com Modeling the Eastern Illinois Santa?Fe from the Prototype
|
Tim Kelley
Good day,
I have been studying this web page to figure out how to modify my Peco Electrfrog turnouts. Pretty straight forward. I have also been studying this youtube video.,.....? I have a question....... This is from one of the web pages I have been looking at it. It says........... ########## Using the factory installed wire at the heel of the frog connect a??or a SPDT switch to power the frog. This restores power to the frog and sets up a control mechanism which maintains the correct phase relationships to the frog and point rails as a train goes through the turnout. A??with contacts may also perform this function. ##############
Will the tortoise switch machines that I am already planning to use do this? (power the frog and do the correct phase relationships) if so then I assume that I wont need a Frog Juicer??? Thanks, Tim |
Hi Tim, You are now well away from jmri, and I'd strongly advise you to join the wiring for dcc group (w4dccqa) in addition to this one. Wouter On Tue, 2 May 2023, 17:59 Tim Kelley, <tim.kelley@...> wrote: Good day, |
Just a note from a guy who took a 28 block DC layout to a 48 block DCC? layout by isolating the turnouts.? For single turnouts, place a signal at least 40 scale feet from the points end of the turnout.? For the frog end of the turnout the turnout number and turnout configuration matters a lot.? For example a No 6 double crossover with 2 inch separation is 40-50 ft from the frog. A number 9 measured about 80 scale feet and a Peco double curved turnout measured about 72 scale feet.? This means that unless you scratch build each turnout there is a little length of rail on each end of the turnout. So don't cut the rail until the track is in place.? Since track configuration matters my advice is to use 2 NMRA track gages and slide them along the frog rails until they touch.? That's the nearest point to cut the rail.??
Another note on resistor wheelsets.? Unless the wheelset somehow can conflict with part of the underside of the car, place it on the outside of the truck.? This is important for backing movements.? Also a thought on detection.? Each time a resistor wheelset enters the block, the resistive value detected halves.?? And a note on the actual signals? My 48 block layout was going to require 92 signal heads.? But looking at the layout on the computer I was able to determine which signals were not really necessary to place on the layout.? They are still part of the signaling system, just not on the layout. Love PECO turnouts.? Used them for 30 years and had very few failures. |
Slight correction on resistance: Special case, when all resistors are equal. Otherwise, use the formula for parallel resistors (R1xR2)/(R1+R2) reiteratively:: The second wheelset with resistor halves the resistance, the third reduces it to 1/3, the fourth to 1/4th, the 5th to 1/5th, and so on. I'm concerned by the use of 47k Ohm resistors for wheelsets. Those will draw less than 1/3 milliAmp each. Most detectors will not sense that, three, four, or even more might need to be in the block before it shows occupancy. It might work acceptably if they are on every wheelset, but probably the car won't be detected until four or more wheelsets are in the block. Test your occupancy detection with resistors directly across the rails, to find the largest resistance that is detected. Then, since all things vary, go one value lower to compensate for most block and sensor variations. Don W -- Don Weigt Connecticut |
As Wouter pointed out, this topic has strayed way past anything to do with JMRI. Further discussion on wiring, resister wheelsets, etc need to be taken elsewhere.
-- Peter Ulvestad JMRI Users Group Moderator ( ) Tam Valley Group Moderator ( ) Sprog-DCC Group Moderator ( ) Edmonton Model Railroad Association ( ) |
On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 15:28, Phillip Sifers <stjocbrr@...> wrote: ... |