¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Re: LogixNG best way with multiple sensors #logixng


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Dave,

> There is a quirk if you cancel a "Full Interlock" NX pair using LogixNG.? The alternate block color does not revert to the standard block color.

Is this a bug or a feature? I haven't used NX pair so I don't know what's expected.

Daniel

On 2025-05-04 22:26, Dave Sand wrote:

Nick,

I use LogixNG to activate and cancel NX pairs. ?There is a quirk if you cancel a "Full Interlock" NX pair using LogixNG. ?The alternate block color does not revert to the standard block color. ?You need to include block actions to set the "Alternate Color Off".

You need to be careful about re-creating NX Pairs. ?The system name is a UUID following "IN:", such as IN:06e4e95a-e0de-445c-863d-05dfdd53b988. ?The NX pairs should be finished before starting with LogixNG.

Dave Sand


----- Original message -----
From: "nicklocke via groups.io" <nick.locke=[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [jmriusers] LogixNG best way with multiple sensors #logixng
Date: Sunday, May 04, 2025 2:56 PM

Hi David,
?
So far, I have determined that the NX bit of JMRI will do what I need it to. I think we have Kevin Dickerson (UK-based and a MERG member, I think, to thank for that).? There will be a few hurdles to jump - subtle little things like cancelling a route by pulling the entrance button rather than by clicking the entrance and the exit for a second time. However, it looks like LogixNG has access to most of the NX functionality, so it shouldn't be too hard.
?
I'll keep you posted.
?
Cheers,? Nick

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.