I must add that soundtraxx responded.? They said to use CV 217 to disable the BEMF.
But as far as JMRI and Decoder Pro, I still will not be able to use that for programming unless I add the motor.? Is that correct?
Let me add that I am using a Raspberry Pi 4 to run JMRI with an interface to an Arduino running DCC-EX.? Would that limit the programming of JMRI?
On Friday, August 30, 2024, danielb987 via <jmri=
[email protected]> wrote:
Ken,
Apologies for the spelling error.
For small engines, four wires between the loco and the tender can
be a problem.
Daniel
On 2024-08-30 16:20, danielb987 wrote:
Ken,
For small engines, for wires between the loco and the tender
can be a problem.
Daniel
On 2024-08-30 15:52, Ken Moordigian
via wrote:
Am I the only one asking the obvious question?
A "decent" sound decoder would be able to handle the motor
requirements of the locomotive.?
Why buy a non sound decoder for the motor then a second
decoder for the sound system?
If it's a question of wires between the tender and engine
there are plug harness's small enough and available...
Would an accessory decoder be more appropriate if truly
required?
Better sound quality would be more a function of a better
speaker, enclosure, and location than other factors, would it
not?
What am I missing?
?
Ken Moordigian
?
?
