Re: Migrate from 2014 iMac to Mac mini m4
What used to be called ¡°Other¡±, in later versions of the Mac OS is now called ¡°System Storage¡± or ¡°System Data." See: Why Is My Mac System Storage So Big?
By
Randy B. Singer
·
#113400
·
|
Re: Migrate from 2014 iMac to Mac mini m4
Detecting what Other is, is very difficult. What OS do you have on your 2014 iMac? Here¡¯s an idea: Go to your Home folder ¡ Macintosh HD -> Users -> Howard (or whatever it's called) Press
By
Peter Rasmusen
·
#113399
·
|
Re: Migrate from 2014 iMac to Mac mini m4
You won¡¯t be able to migrate everything but Other in the way you hope. It¡¯s best to figure out what it is first. You can use a tool like OmniDiskSweeper <https://www.omnigroup.com/more> to do so.
By
Ben Rosenthal
·
#113398
·
|
Migrate from 2014 iMac to Mac mini m4
I¡¯m planning to give up my iMac , late 2014, for a new Mac mini m4. I¡¯m thinking of going with the 512 GB ?version. I have an overkill 4 TB SSD drive in the iMac. When I checked the storage of
By
Howard Kirsch
·
#113397
·
|
Re: Recent change in cursor behavior
What sites were giving this behavior?
By
Ben Rosenthal
·
#113396
·
|
Recent change in cursor behavior
Last weekend, I noticed clicking on a browser button in two social media sites would cause the display to jump away, usually back a couple of frames requiring a second click. ?Sometimes it would
By
Budd Turner
·
#113395
·
|
Re: Update on slow apple mail response
Excellent and to-the-point info. Thanks! Peter
By
Peter Rasmusen
·
#113394
·
|
Update on slow apple mail response
If you recall, I complained about Apple Mail fetching mail slowly. Then Randy showed me/us how to rebuild the mail envelope, and that fixed the problem. Upon installation of a new Sequoia update, mail
By
Paul Blumstein
·
#113393
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
Solved indeed! And I thank you all for your help. Kurt Youngmann *** "It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.¡± - Murphy¡¯s 11th law
By
kurt youngmann
·
#113392
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
I think that there have been several good answers, and Kurt just needs to decide which is preferred. (I¡¯ve also enjoyed learning about how classwork was marked in the USA in the 1950s!) Otto
By
Otto Nikolaus
·
#113391
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
I think this has gone a bit off ¡ but I wonder if Kurt had his problem solved? :-)
By
Peter Rasmusen
·
#113390
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
It was used when I was in elementary school in Los Angeles in the 1950¡¯s. Don¡¯t know about the rest of the country. It verified, to the student, that the teacher had checked every answer and gave
By
Jerald Levinson
·
#113389
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
I think this was a personal choice or decision, as I have not seen it. If the answer was unmakred it was correct. Or vise versa. Generally, the incorrect answers were marked. I went to school and
By
Brent
·
#113388
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
This would a hand-written list of answers, such as in a ¡°pub quiz¡±. :-) Otto
By
Otto Nikolaus
·
#113387
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
I¡¯m not familiar with that convention; was it so in the USA as a whole or just in Hawaii? Otto
By
Otto Nikolaus
·
#113386
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
If those are the rules for the items which you are marking, then of course follow those rules. Personally, I haven¡¯t seen that. I¡¯ve just seen the requirement to mark a box where the associated
By
potentmap
·
#113385
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
In the ¡°good old days¡±, correct answers were marked with a ¡°C¡± and wrong answers got the check. However, when there is a box to mark, either a check or an ¡°X¡± should suffice. Jerry
By
Jerald Levinson
·
#113384
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
Funnily enough, when marking answers to questions, ? means correct whereas x means incorrect. So, wouldn't x mean the opposite? ;-) I have some spreadsheets where I have a ¡°check¡± column. I test
By
Otto Nikolaus
·
#113383
·
|
Re: a very simple question (I hope)
Most of the time, x will be accepted instead of ??. Alvin
By
potentmap
·
#113382
·
|
Re: (Edited) Update is required to connect to your phone?
On May 19, 2025, at 10:30, Brent via groups.io <whodo678@...> wrote: ?Thank you, Brian. See, even if you can¡¯t give a detailed explanation, you can have something to offer. We have
By
Brent
·
#113381
·
|