开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date
Re: Fake - comment from another list
Hi Guys, I believe we can all afford the modest luxury of waiting until mid-year, to see whether or not the promised announcement materialises. A product such as the IC-7000 makes sense, as it is
By Adam Farson · #285 ·
Re: Fake - comment from another list
I belive it is a hoax. Hell... I was fooled by a website with a annoucement of the "new" Yaesu FT 958. I remember we had the same discussion before the Yaesu 857 came out. What finally ended the
By kyradio101 <kyradio@...> · #284 ·
Re: Fake - comment from another list
A radio that will be built in Asia, and there's no mention in the Asian trade mags... A radio whose largest target market is North America, and Icom-North America knows nothing about it. And to
By Clint Bradford <clintbrad4d@...> · #283 ·
Re: Fake - comment from another list
Ladies and gentlemen, May I suggest that we stop quarrelling about whether the IC-7000 really exists or not, and simply wait until 2Q/2005 - as the web page "sez"? As I remarked last week: If the
By Adam Farson · #282 ·
Re: Fake?
N1PXB wrote: <snip> Well ,for now I would like it to be true, since it sounds like a nice That's the nice thing about it. It is what you want it to be. Until it's announced by Icom, everything
By Keith V <kavan@...> · #281 ·
Re: Fake?
That is what the original article in the French ham magazine said it was. {^_^}
By jdow <jdow@...> · #280 ·
Fake?
Hello all, Here is why - There is no natural picture like shadows and shines - The picture is bright less - The scope meter shows a very high resolution...I think even on those modern digital
By Rodrigo <yid_grps@...> · #279 ·
Re: Fake - comment from another list
Not my comment, don't shoot the messenger. If it's like most other products, many of the reps have no idea what it looks like. Tom NU4G
By Tom Norris <r390a@...> · #278 ·
Re: Fake?
Here Here Me Too Cant wait to see what's in store. 73 De k9ghz Frank Rob Boux <boux@...> wrote: Hi all, Could it be a proto type drawing using computer software? Hey, we all know the 706xxx
By Frank · #277 ·
Re: Fake?
--- Rodrigo <yid_grps@...> wrote:.> When the pic was released by the French magazine it was admittedly a CAD drawing. But I guess they all start that way! 73, Paul
By Paul Manuel <k4pdm@...> · #276 ·
Re: Fake?
Hi all, Could it be a proto type drawing using computer software? Hey, we all know the 706xxx days are coming to an end. The radio has been around for darn near 10 years already (706, 706mkII,
By Rob Boux <boux@...> · #275 ·
Fake?
Hello After looking at that only picture for a few minutes of this "new" radio from Icom I started to think it is a drawing rather than a picture... Anyone share the same idea? 73 Rod
By Rodrigo <yid_grps@...> · #274 ·
Re: New details
Well, I would think that these specs are best guess on their part. They took the rumors and blended them with the existing 706 specs. I mean look at the weight, power consumption etc..exact same copy
By MKM <starlight04@...> · #273 ·
Re: New details
http://www.elkel.qc.ca/Liste/ic-7000.htm and another from Canada Marty
By Marty <kt4k@...> · #272 ·
New details
http://www.rys.nl/ic7000.html Did I miss an announcement? Marty
By Marty <kt4k@...> · #271 ·
Re: TEST
Hi Greg, As the radio is not yet on the market, there is no test report. Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
By Adam Farson · #270 ·
Re: TEST
Hi all just asking dose anybody have one please could you give me a test or RTS report on the radio. gregory Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT --------------------------------- Yahoo!
By gregory fox · #269 ·
Web site
Group, This site can also be accessed for the ic7000 http://www.ham.dmz.ro/icom/general_news 73 Jim w3mrb
By J.W. Bursler <w8mjb@...> · #268 ·
Web Site
Group, Here is a web site that you might be interested in. http://www.ham.dmz.ro/icom-7000.php 73 Jim w3mrb
By J.W. Bursler <w8mjb@...> · #267 ·
Re: RadCom
Same here in Sweden. They sell the mk2g to ham clubs for 50% off now, but only to clubs, and they “have no information” of a new rig in the same product category :) /Per _____ Fr?n:
By Per Eriksson <sm4xiu@...> · #266 ·